True or false? |z|^2 is an entire function

  • Thread starter Thread starter docnet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that the function |z|^2 is not an entire function due to the non-analytic nature of the absolute value function at z=0. Participants clarify that while the sum of two non-analytic functions can sometimes yield an analytic function, |z|^2 fails to meet the criteria for analyticity. The Cauchy-Riemann equations are referenced to demonstrate the conditions under which a function is complex differentiable, and it is established that |z|^2 is only complex differentiable at z=0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy-Riemann equations
  • Knowledge of analytic and entire functions
  • Basic concepts of complex differentiation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy-Riemann equations in detail
  • Explore examples of analytic and non-analytic functions
  • Learn about the implications of functions being entire
  • Investigate the properties of complex differentiable functions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of complex analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of complex functions and their differentiability.

docnet
Messages
796
Reaction score
486
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
Screen Shot 2021-12-23 at 1.50.36 PM.png


False

The reasoning for answer:

The absolute value function is is not analytic wherever its argument equals zero. ##f## is not analytic at ##z=0## so it is not entire.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
docnet said:
Homework Statement:: .
Relevant Equations:: .

View attachment 294651

False

The reasoning for answer:

The absolute value function is is not analytic wherever its argument equals zero. ##f## is not analytic at ##z=0## so it is not entire.
That's a fairly significant logical fallacy!

In general, if ##f(z) = f_1(z) + f_2(z)##, then even if ##f_1## and ##f_2## are not analytic, their sum may be. Intuitively, the non-analytic behaviour of ##f_1## and ##f_2## may cancel each other out in some way.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet and S.G. Janssens
What can you say about the zeros of ##f## in the complex plane?
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet
PeroK said:
That's a fairly significant logical fallacy!

In general, if ##f(z) = f_1(z) + f_2(z)##, then even if ##f_1## and ##f_2## are not analytic, their sum may be. Intuitively, the non-analytic behaviour of ##f_1## and ##f_2## may cancel each other out in some way.
really? that is surprising to me.
 
Take as an example: $$f(z) = z = Re(z) +iIm(z)$$ is the sum of two non-analytic functions!
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet
S.G. Janssens said:
What can you say about the zeros of ##f## in the complex plane?
the zeroes of ##f## are given by $$|z|^2=2zRe(z)$$
the left size is real valued, so the right side has to be real valued. The equation ##x^2=2x^2## has no solutions other than ##x=0##, so the zero of ##f## is ##z=0##.
 
You have one thing a bit backwards: ##z=0## is actually the only point where ##|z|^2## is complex differentiable. You can verify this from the Cauchy Riemann equations.

And anyway, a function ##f## being (not) differentiable at a point doesn't mean the same is true for ##f+g.##

For your function, you can also write it in real and imaginary parts and see whether the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold.

Edit: Apologies, while I was writing this, several posts appeared that i didn't notice!
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet
PeroK said:
Take as an example: $$f(z) = z = Re(z) +iIm(z)$$ is the sum of two non-analytic functions!
okay.. that makes sense
 
Infrared said:
You have one thing a bit backwards: ##z=0## is actually the only point where ##|z|^2## is complex differentiable. You can verify this from the Cauchy Riemann equations.

And anyway, a function ##f## being (not) differentiable at a point doesn't mean the same is true for ##f+g.##

For your function, you can also write it in real and imaginary parts and see whether the Cauchy-Riemann equations hold.
How do you tell the real and imaginary parts of ##z## in the absolute value function? this is what I wanted to do, compute the Cauchy Riemann equations, but the absolute value function confused me.
 
  • #10
docnet said:
okay.. that makes sense
You know what I'm going to say ... you did the same thing again! You jumped at an easy, one-line proof, that you didn't seriously question. You must be able to fully justify each step you take.

Developing your maths skills means developing the ability to find the example I gave in post #5.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet
  • #11
docnet said:
How do you tell the real and imaginary parts of ##z## in the absolute value function? this is what I wanted to do, compute the Cauchy Riemann equations, but the absolute value function confused me.
Oh gosh.. I forgot that the absolute value function has a formal definition ##|z|=\sqrt{z\bar{z}}##. I'm so sorry @PeroK
 
  • #12
docnet said:
How do you tell the real and imaginary parts of ##z## in the absolute value function? this is what I wanted to do, compute the Cauchy Riemann equations, but the absolute value function confused me.
The absolute value is real, it has no imaginary part.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet
  • #13
docnet said:
How do you tell the real and imaginary parts of in the value funciton? this is what I wanted to do, compute the Cauchy Riemann equations, but the absolute value funciton confused me.
You would write ##z=x+iy## (so ##\text{Re}(z)=x## and ##|z|^2=x^2+y^2##).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet and PeroK
  • #14
$$f=|z|^2-2zRe(z)=x^2+y^2-2(x+iy)x$$
$$=(y^2-x^2)-i(2xy)$$
$$v_x=-2x=u_y$$
$$-v_y=-2y=u_x$$
so ##f=|z|^2-2zRe(z)## satisfies the Cauchy Riemann equations and so it's entire.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • #15
docnet said:
so ##f=|z|^2-2zRe(z)## satisfies the Cauchy Riemann equations and so it's entire.
Would you believe it!
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: docnet
  • #16
There goes my dreams for a Ph.D in maths, smashed to granules.
 
  • #17
docnet said:
There goes my dreams for a Ph.D in maths, smashed to granules.
You'd certainly bash out a PhD thesis quickly enough. Whether it would be defensible is another matter! :smile:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: docnet

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K