Truss Analysis - Method of Joints

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analysis of a truss structure using the method of joints, focusing on the calculation of forces in the members and the interpretation of force directions. Participants explore the implications of positive and negative values in their calculations and how these relate to the physical behavior of the truss members.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculated support reactions and member forces, noting a discrepancy in the direction of force FAB as indicated in the mark scheme.
  • Another participant emphasized the importance of indicating the correct direction of forces on diagrams, stating that tension forces pull away from the joints they act upon.
  • A later reply questioned the interpretation of negative force values, asking whether a negative value indicates compression and how it relates to the direction of forces at the joints.
  • Participants discussed the implications of choosing positive directions for their calculations and how this affects the interpretation of results.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the importance of correctly interpreting force directions and the implications of positive and negative values. However, there is no consensus on the specific interpretations of the force directions and the handling of negative values, indicating ongoing uncertainty and debate.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of vector addition and the effects of sign conventions on force direction. The discussion does not resolve these issues, leaving room for further exploration.

influx
Messages
162
Reaction score
1
trus.png


Ok so first I considered the entire structure (which is in equilbrium) and resolved to find out that HA = -4.8 kN, VA= -0.9 kN and VE=0.9 kN. (these answers were correct according to mark scheme) Then I considered each joint separately (in order to find the forces in each of the members). I started with A and I found that FAB = 1.5 kN and FAF = 3.6kN. I then decided to consider joint B. However, this is where I ran into a problem. When considering joint A, I calculated FAB to be 1.5kN. Since it is positive, surely this means that my initial assumption was correct and the direction of the force is indeed from A to B? So it should be as so:

image1dld.jpg


However, in the mark scheme they appear to have drawn the 1.5kN force in the opposite direction (so from B to A)... Why is this so? I have been getting stuck on the direction in several problems like this..

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
influx said:
trus.png


Ok so first I considered the entire structure (which is in equilbrium) and resolved to find out that HA = -4.8 kN, VA= -0.9 kN and VE=0.9 kN. (these answers were correct according to mark scheme) Then I considered each joint separately (in order to find the forces in each of the members). I started with A and I found that FAB = 1.5 kN and FAF = 3.6kN. I then decided to consider joint B. However, this is where I ran into a problem. When considering joint A, I calculated FAB to be 1.5kN. Since it is positive, surely this means that my initial assumption was correct and the direction of the force is indeed from A to B? So it should be as so:


However, in the mark scheme they appear to have drawn the 1.5kN force in the opposite direction (so from B to A)... Why is this so? I have been getting stuck on the direction in several problems like this..

Thanks
It is very easy to get beaten by the plus and minus sign. You have correctly calculated the support reactions, but be sure to indicate their direction on the diagram. Va points down and Ha points left.. You will then find that Fab pulls away from joint A (tension), and thus when looking at joint B, Fab must point away from joint B, not toward it, per Newton's 3rd law. Tension forces always pull away from the joints on which they act.
 
PhanthomJay said:
It is very easy to get beaten by the plus and minus sign. You have correctly calculated the support reactions, but be sure to indicate their direction on the diagram. Va points down and Ha points left.. You will then find that Fab pulls away from joint A (tension), and thus when looking at joint B, Fab must point away from joint B, not toward it, per Newton's 3rd law. Tension forces always pull away from the joints on which they act.

Thanks..

IF FAB = -1.5 kN , it would mean the member AB is under compression and hence the force exerted by the two ends would point at each joint (rather than away from it), but would the force pointing at each joint equal -1.5 kN or +1.5kN?

Cheers !
 
You have to be very careful with the interpretation of the minus sign, because it often means different things. As in your example, you chose roght and up as positive, and determined that Ha and Va were negative, hence, acting opposite to the direction you showed on the diagram. Immediately, correct your diagram to show the proper direction if the support forces on the structure. Otherwise you will get hopelessly buried by the minus sign. Now when you look at the equilibrium of joint A, you determine that the y force component of Fab on joint A is acting up, and its x component is acting to the right, and thus the magnitude of the resultant force of Fab on joint A is the sq rt of the sum of the squares, or 1.5 N , but its direction is determined from vector addition, pointing away from the joint, or in tension. If you look at the forces in the member AB, at either end, they also pull away from the member...tension. joint
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
16K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K