Truth Value of Statements with Integers: Proving or Simply Looking?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the truth value of several mathematical statements involving integers. Participants debate whether these values can be assessed through simple observation or if a formal proof is necessary. The first statement, asserting that the square of any integer is non-negative, is universally true and can be proven by considering different cases for integers. Other statements, such as the existence of an integer whose square equals 2 or is less than 0, require different approaches, including negation and direct proof methods. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the balance between intuitive understanding and rigorous mathematical proof in evaluating truth values.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
The question is, "Determine the truth value of each of these statements if the domain consists of all integers?"

The statements are:

\forall n(n^2 \geq 0)

\exists n(n^2=2)

\forall n(n^2\geq n)

\exists n(n^2 less than 0)

Does it seem, from reading the question, that I am to determine the truth value of the statement by simply looking at it, or is there some proving process involved?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can determine the truth by simply looking at it, that seems fine to me. If this is homework, you may want to write a brief explanation even if you could see that it was true by inspection. For example, for the first statement you might write "this square of any real number is ______, therefore this statement is _______"
 
What if I was to prove them? How would I go about that? Any hints? Would negating each statement be a good start?
 
Negation might be useful for some of these. Others will probably be more straightforward to prove directly.

For example, to prove that n^2 \geq 0 is true for all integers n, try considering the following three cases separately: n > 0, n = 0, n < 0.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
909
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K