Trying not to ruin what I edit

  • Thread starter Thread starter symbolipoint
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the challenges of editing text without compromising the original content. Users are trying to remove a strike-through effect from a specific word while ensuring the rest of the text remains intact. There is confusion regarding the tools available in the editing menu, particularly between the strike-through and underline functions. One user suggests switching to the BBCode editor for more precise editing, especially when dealing with nested quotes. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the editing tools to achieve desired formatting outcomes.
symbolipoint
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
7,544
Reaction score
1,993
This is for practice hope learn how to do an edit without ruining what I wrote.

Here line plain clear
Here line make scratch-through

Back to clear?

Next, I try to remove the strike-through ONLY on the word, "make".
I try like this:
highlight "make" with the strike-through done;
open three-dot menu;
click the strike-though tool.
That SEEMS to work.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine to me. What was the issue?
 
berkeman said:
Looks fine to me. What was the issue?
Not sure yet. I believe I missed seeing the "S" with the slash-through tool in the three-dots toolbar menu, and instead clicked on the horizontal line tool. I will continue rechecking.
 
You can always switch to the BBCODE editor for any fine tuning. Thats what I do, especially when nesting quotes.

1000008370.webp
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Likes jtbell, Nugatory, symbolipoint and 1 other person
DaveC426913 said:
You can always switch to the BBCODE editor for any fine tuning. Thats what I do, especially when nesting quotes.
The only way I ever edit.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444 and mfb
symbolipoint said:
Not sure yet. I believe I missed seeing the "S" with the slash-through tool in the three-dots toolbar menu, and instead clicked on the horizontal line tool. I will continue rechecking.
The S with a slash through it is the "strike" tool, as in striking out something. What you're calling the horizontal line tool is the U symbol, for "underline." Both are available after clicking the 3 vertical dots icon in the BBCode menu.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Back
Top