Trying to design a robotic joint.

  • Thread starter Thread starter dennis_n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Design Joint
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on designing a robotic joint capable of precise rotational motion for a ∏ shaped frame with a 1kg load. The user seeks to minimize torque requirements on the servo while maintaining precision, considering options like timing belts, pulleys, and counterweights. Key recommendations include calculating torque based on the axis of rotation and using mechanical or magnetic catches to prevent overshoot. The conversation emphasizes the importance of balancing the load to reduce torque demands on the servo.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque calculations for rotating systems
  • Familiarity with servo motor specifications and limitations
  • Knowledge of timing belts and pulley systems
  • Basic principles of mechanical design and balancing loads
NEXT STEPS
  • Research torque calculation methods for horizontal and vertical axes
  • Explore different types of servo motors suitable for low-torque applications
  • Investigate the design and implementation of timing belt and pulley systems
  • Learn about mechanical and magnetic catch mechanisms for motion control
USEFUL FOR

Robotics enthusiasts, mechanical engineers, and hobbyists involved in designing robotic joints or similar motion control systems.

dennis_n
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone. This is my first post on the forums.

I wanted to ask your expertise on a project I'm working on.
I'm trying to design a setup where I rotate a ∏ shaped frame that has a 1kg load on the horizontal bar. The space between the frame should stay empty.
The length of the side rods may be up to 1 meter, with the ability to slide the horizontal bar up and down.
I need precise rotational motion so at first I thought let's go simple and attach a servo directly to the joint. Then I realized that the torque requirements would be tremendous at one meter away.
I'm on a budget here so I don't want to spend too much on a servo unless I really have to.
So what would be a setup that would minimize the torque requirements on the servo while keeping the precision? Timing belt and pulley? I'm not sure how this setup would work.
The weight (horizontal bar) has to rotate from 0 to 90 degrees around the joint.
It is important that the breaking between rotations, doesn't produce any bouncing.
I'm also trying to keep the machining requirements minimal cause I don't have much else than a drill and a saw.
Any ideas? Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Can you explain a bit more clearly?

If it's rotating about a vertical axis then it may only need a very low torque. That also depends on the acceleration. If it's a horizontal axis, calculate the torque required to overcome gravity. Once you have some estimated numbers you can compare to shafts, belts etc. to get a feel for what kind of drive might work.

"precise" could mean a lot of things. Maybe you need feedback somewhere else on the frame to allow it to bend?

Doesn't really seem like ANSYS would be much on a simple frame structure like this.
 
Unrest said:
Can you explain a bit more clearly?

If it's rotating about a vertical axis then it may only need a very low torque. That also depends on the acceleration. If it's a horizontal axis, calculate the torque required to overcome gravity. Once you have some estimated numbers you can compare to shafts, belts etc. to get a feel for what kind of drive might work.

"precise" could mean a lot of things. Maybe you need feedback somewhere else on the frame to allow it to bend?

Doesn't really seem like ANSYS would be much on a simple frame structure like this.

The whole setup is to to do spherical photography. Here is a quick model I made of the whole setup as I was thinking it originally.
 

Attachments

  • mocap.jpg
    mocap.jpg
    15.4 KB · Views: 518
Because of the limited range of motion, you could also use a big pulley with a steel wire or chain fixed to it. Wind the other end of the loop around a drum on the servo/motor.

If you're not worried about speed you could also put a counterweight on the arm and that eliminates the torque problem. Drive it with anything depending on how accurately it's balanced.

A cheap way to prevent overshoot may be to use a mechanical or magnetic catch to grab the arm when it's at the end of it's path. Then release the catch and move again after any vibrations have died away.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K