Trying to design Wind Turbine Blades

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
jonagad
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Blade Element Momentum
Relevant Equations
Reynolds numer:
Re=((V)*(ρ)*(c))/μ
Where:
V:wind velocity
ρ: density
c: chord
μ: Dynamic viscosity
Hello, I'm trying to follow the instructions from the book "Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines"-Martin O.L. Hansen, to design a blade, the method it's the BEM accounting for the tip loss (Prandtl) and Glauert corrections, but I can't get it right, for the Cl (lift coefficient) and Cd (drag coefficient) I need the Reynolds number, but in order to calculate de Re, I need the chord, how can I give a value to the chord?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to assume a chord distribution. See what comes out and if not feasible / desirable, choose another chord distribution. That's the design iteration loop.
 
Ps: it is usually referred to as BEMT (Blade Element Momentum Theory), not to be confused with BEM (Boundary Element Method)
 
Arjan82 said:
You need to assume a chord distribution. See what comes out and if not feasible / desirable, choose another chord distribution. That's the design iteration loop.
Ohh, I see, that´s exactly what I was doubting, thank you for responding, i will do that.

This is what I have, if you want to check it out:
Data:
a: Axial Induction factor
a´: Angular induction factor
Both a and a´ usually are =0 initially.
Then it´s an iterative process
U_1=5.17m/s
Ω=25rpm2.61799388rad/s
R=1.25m
B=3
a_c=0.2
Results:
AirfoilS823S823S823S822S822S822S822S822
No12345678
Section0.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
a=0.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.1999990.199999
a´=00000000
r=0.250.3750.50.6250.750.87511.125
λ_r=0.126595450.189893170.25319090.316488620.379786350.443084070.506381790.56967952
tanφ=6.319350414.212900273.15967522.527740162.106450141.805528691.57983761.40430009
φ=1.413853591.337743211.264282191.194079911.12756641.06499871.006481690.95199662
f=6.07465913.597248682.359996671.613115581.106964680.734871670.443810430.2046056
F=0.99853550.982555070.939800340.872288560.785524250.681587490.556552640.39350817
α(°)=8.98.98.99.39.39.39.39.3
α(rad)=0.15533430.15533430.15533430.162315620.162315620.162315620.162315620.16231562
θ_p=1.258519291.182408911.108947891.031764290.965250780.902683080.844166070.789681
C_l1.21.21.211111
C_d0.0180.0180.0180.010.010.010.010.01
C_n0.205337880.294652390.379245540.377167910.437893230.493253230.54328640.5882036
C_t1.182438311.16340191.138638140.926198880.89908260.869943250.839606990.80877471
supposed chord=0.30.30.30.30.30.30.30.3
σ=0.57295780.381971860.28647890.229183120.190985930.163702230.143239450.12732395
K=33.120011333.057554331.450295334.902325430.660727525.83824520.4240713.9456387
a (if≤a_c)=0.031133240.03119390.03284040.02949650.033714610.040260490.051482520.07724609
a (if>a_c)=-0.014839980.028547770.029921870.027118490.030646570.035968280.044683980.06296168
a´=-11.12852991.012833760.431917720.216319250.1642240.140566920.13577140.16071096
dF_N=0.58509770.432562060.577875660.608327260.741833540.879084531.013705671.11762702
dQ=3.369285471.707922751.735000681.493849351.5231331.550428071.566603481.53672719
dr=0.250.1250.1250.1250.1250.1250.1250.125
U_rel=5.071369575.147896745.244662675.395874925.530058395.672061745.803662125.85659519
dF_T=4.492380631.518153551.156667120.796719650.6769480.590639260.522201160.45532658
dF_L=1.139775480.587216770.609500290.537627280.564698950.59407250.621959050.6333561
dF_D=0.017096630.008808250.00914250.005376270.005646990.005940720.006219590.00633356
 
Of course, thank you
Arjan82 said:
Ps: it is usually referred to as BEMT (Blade Element Momentum Theory), not to be confused with BEM (Boundary Element Method)