Calculating Heat Transfer in a Tube and Shell Exercise

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating heat transfer in a tube and shell configuration using the Dittus-Boelter equation and log mean temperature difference. The heat transfer coefficients were determined as hi=560 W/m²*K and ho=4500 W/m²*K, leading to an overall heat transfer coefficient U of 497 W/m²*K. The area required for heat transfer was calculated as A=0.370 m², resulting in a length L of 1.18 m for the heat exchanger. The calculations were verified and corrected based on the total flow rate and the number of pipes involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of heat transfer principles, specifically in tube and shell configurations.
  • Familiarity with the Dittus-Boelter equation for Nusselt number calculation.
  • Knowledge of log mean temperature difference (LMTD) calculations.
  • Ability to perform fluid dynamics calculations, including Reynolds and Prandtl numbers.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Dittus-Boelter equation in detail for various flow conditions.
  • Learn about log mean temperature difference (LMTD) applications in heat exchangers.
  • Explore fluid dynamics concepts, focusing on Reynolds and Prandtl numbers.
  • Investigate different heat exchanger designs and their efficiency metrics.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, thermal engineers, and students studying heat transfer and fluid dynamics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those involved in designing and analyzing heat exchangers.

williamcarter
Messages
153
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement


Would really appreciate if you could lend me a hand with this tube and shell exercise.[/B]
tubeandshell.JPG

m=0.24kg/s
##D=2.5*10-2m##
ρ=850 kg/m^3
cp=2000 J/kg*K
μ=2*10-4 kg/m*s
λ=0.3W/m*k

Homework Equations


Dittus-Boelter:Nu=0.023*Re0.8*Prn
where n=0.4 heating and n=0.3 for cooling, so in our case n=0.3
Log mean temp##ΔTlm=\frac {ΔT1-ΔT2} {ln(ΔT1/ΔT2)}##

The Attempt at a Solution


i)hi=?

Apply Dittus-Boelter eq Nu=0.023*Re0.8*Pr0.3
=>##\frac {h*D} {λ}##= ##0.023*(\frac {4*m} {\pi*D*μ})^{0.8}## ##* (\frac{cp*μ} {λ})^{0.3}##
We have all data from above
##h=λ*0.023*(\frac {4*0.24} {\pi*2.5*10^-2*10^-4})^{0.8}## ##* (\frac{2000*2*10^-4} {0.3})^{0.3}##
hi=50.72 W/m^2*K

ii)ΔTlm=?(log mean temp)
##ΔTlm=\frac {ΔT1-ΔT2} {ln(ΔT1/ΔT2)}##
Where ΔT1=left hand side temp diff, and ΔT2 is right hand side temp difference.
Oil is on hot side, water on cold side.
Oil:Tin=420K; Tout=320K
Water: tin=290K ,tout=?
up.png


##tcout=tcin+\frac{Qhot} {mcold*cpcold}##
##Qhot=m*cp*ΔT=0.24*2000*(420-320)##
##Qhot=48000J##
=>##tcout=290K+\frac{48000} {0.24*4180}##
=>tcout=337.84K
=>ΔT1=320-290k
ΔT1=30K

ΔT2=420-337K
ΔT2=83K
=>##ΔTlm=\frac{30-83} {ln(30/83}##
=>ΔTlm=52K

iii)ho=4.5 KW/m^2*K
L=?
I think we need to apply again Dittus-Boelter but not sure about this?
Need more hints here
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to apply Dittus-Boelter again. You know that the the inside heat transfer coefficient is 50.72 and the outside heat transfer coefficient is 4500. What is the overall heat transfer coefficient U?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
You don't need to apply Dittus-Boelter again. You know that the the inside heat transfer coefficient is 50.72 and the outside heat transfer coefficient is 4500. What is the overall heat transfer coefficient U?

Are i) and ii) correct?

U=##\frac{1} {1/hi+1/ho}##

U=##\frac{1} {1/50.72+1/4500}##

U=50.15

But how to get the length?
 
williamcarter said:
Are i) and ii) correct?

U=##\frac{1} {1/hi+1/ho}##

U=##\frac{1} {1/50.72+1/4500}##

U=50.15

But how to get the length?
$$Q=UA(\Delta T)_{lm}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
$$Q=UA(\Delta T)_{lm}$$
Right.

##A=\pi*D*L##
##L=\frac{A} {\pi*D}##
##A=\frac{Q} {U*ΔTlm}##
A=48000/(50.15*52.08)
A=18.37m2
##L=\frac{18.37} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}}##

L=233.99m
L~234 meters
 
Go back and recheck your analysis. There are 5 pipes, not one. This would affect your answers in parts i and iii. The total rate of heat flow should be in W, not J.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
Chestermiller said:
Go back and recheck your analysis. There are 5 pipes, not one. This would affect your answers in parts i and iii. The total rate of heat flow should be in W, not J.

Q=48000 W
hi=5*50.72 => ##hin=253.6 W/m^2*K ##
hout=4500 W/m^2*K
##U=\frac{1} {1/hi+1/ho}##
##U=\frac{1} {1/253.6+1/4500}##

=>U=240.07
##A=\pi*D*L##
##L=\frac{A} {\pi*D}##
##A=\frac{Q} {U*ΔTlm}##
A=48000/(240.07*52.08)
A=3.83m2
##L=\frac{3.83} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}}##

L=48.88 m
 
williamcarter said:
Q=48000 W
hi=5*50.72 => ##hin=253.6 W/m^2*K ##
hout=4500 W/m^2*K
##U=\frac{1} {1/hi+1/ho}##
##U=\frac{1} {1/253.6+1/4500}##

=>U=240.07
##A=\pi*D*L##
##L=\frac{A} {\pi*D}##
##A=\frac{Q} {U*ΔTlm}##
A=48000/(240.07*52.08)
A=3.83m2
##L=\frac{3.83} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}}##

L=48.88 m
This is definitely not correct. You don't just multiply the inside heat transfer coefficient by 5. Please go back and redo part (i) correctly. What should m really be in part (i)?
 
Chestermiller said:
This is definitely not correct. You don't just multiply the inside heat transfer coefficient by 5. Please go back and redo part (i) correctly. What should m really be in part (i)?

Q=48000 W
m'=5*m
where m=0.24kg/s (mass flowrate for 1 pipe)
=>m'=1.2 kg/s mass flowrate
hout=4500 W/m^2*K

##hin=0.3*0.023*(\frac{4*1.2} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}*10^{-4}})^{0.8}##*##(\frac{2000*2*10^{-4}} {0.3})^{0.3}##
=>##hin=320.07 W/m^2*K##

##U=\frac{1} {1/hi+1/ho}##
##U=\frac{1} {1/320.07+1/4500}##

=>U=298.81

##A=\pi*D*L##
##L=\frac{A} {\pi*D}##
##A=\frac{Q} {U*ΔTlm}##
A=48000/(298.81*52.08)
A=3.08m2
##L=\frac{3.08} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}}##

L=39.27 m
 
  • #10
m'=m/5=0.048
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
m'=m/5=0.048
Thank you.
I assume that's because the pipes are in parallel and all identical
hence m'=m/5
 
  • #12
williamcarter said:
Thank you.
I assume that's because the pipes are in parallel and all identical
hence m'=m/5
Sure.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
  • #13
Chestermiller said:
m'=m/5=0.048
so m'=0.048

=>##hin=0.3*0.023*(\frac {4*0.048} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}*10^{-4}})^{0.8}## *##(\frac {2000*2*10^{-4}} {0.3})^{0.3}##
hin=24.38 W/m2*K
hout=4500 W/m2*K

U=1/(1/hi+1/ho)=>U=1/(1(24.38)+1/(4500))
U=24.23

for Area
williamcarter said:
A=##\frac{Q} {U*ΔTlm}##

##A=\frac{48000} {24.23*52.08}##

A=38.03 m2
##L=\frac{A} {\pi*D}##

##L=\frac{38.03} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}}##

=>L=484.31 m

Is this correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #14
williamcarter said:
so m'=0.048

=>##hin=0.3*0.023*(\frac {4*0.048} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}*10^{-4}})^{0.8}## *##(\frac {2000*2*10^{-4}} {0.3})^{0.3}##
hin=24.38 W/m2*K
hout=4500 W/m2*K

U=1/(1/hi+1/ho)=>U=1/(1(24.38)+1/(4500))
U=24.23

for Area##A=\frac{48000} {24.23*52.08}##

A=38.03 m2
##L=\frac{A} {\pi*D}##

##L=\frac{38.03} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}}##

=>L=484.31 m

Is this correct?
No. The heat transfer area is ##5\pi DL##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
  • #15
Chestermiller said:
No. The heat transfer area is ##5\pi DL##
Thank you for your answer
##A=\frac{48000} {24.23*52.08}##

A=38.03 m2

##A=5*\pi*D*L##

=>##L=\frac {A} {5*\pi*D}##

##L=\frac {38.03} {5*\pi*25*10^{-2}}##

L=96.86 m
 
  • #16
I get Re = 10186, Pr = 1.6, Nu = 42.6, and ##h_{in}=511##
 
  • #17
Chestermiller said:
I get Re = 10186, Pr = 1.6, Nu = 42.6, and ##h_{in}=511##

I did ##Re=\frac {4*m'} {\pi*D*μ}##

##Re=\frac {4*0.24/5} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}*2*10^{-4}}##

this gave me Re=12223

for Prandlt I did
##Pr=\frac {cp*μ} {λ}##
##Pr=\frac {2000*2*10^{-4}} {0.3}##
this gave me Pr=1.3
 
  • #18
williamcarter said:
I did ##Re=\frac {4*m'} {\pi*D*μ}##

##Re=\frac {4*0.24/5} {\pi*2.5*10^{-2}*2*10^{-4}}##

this gave me Re=12223

for Prandlt I did
##Pr=\frac {cp*μ} {λ}##
##Pr=\frac {2000*2*10^{-4}} {0.3}##
this gave me Pr=1.3
OK. I mistakenly used ##\mu=2.4\times 10^{-4}##.
What about hin. It looks like you forgot to divide by the diameter. I get 560 now.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter
  • #19
Chestermiller said:
OK. I mistakenly used ##\mu=2.4\times 10^{-4}##.
What about hin. It looks like you forgot to divide by the diameter. I get 560 now.
Thank you, yes indeed hi=560. W/m2*K

for ii) I did like this
Qh=mhot*cphot*ΔT=0.24/5*2000*(420-320)
Qh=9600W
##Tcout=Tcin+\frac{Qh} {mcold*cpcold}##
##Tcout=290+\frac{9600} {0.24/5*4180}##
=>Tcout=337.84K

##ΔTlm=\frac{ΔT1-ΔT2} {ln(ΔT1/ΔT2)}##
##ΔTlm=\frac{30-83} {ln(30/83)}##
=>ΔTlm=52.08K

for iii)
ho=4500W/m2*K
hi=560 W/m2*K from i)

##U=\frac{1} {1/hi+1/ho}##
##U=\frac{1} {1/560+1/4500}##

U=497

##Q=U*A*ΔTlm##

=>##A=\frac {Q} {U*ΔTlm}##

##A=\frac {9600} {497*52.08}##

=>A=0.370m m2

but ##A=\pi*D*L##

so ##L=\frac {A} {\pi*D}##

##L=\frac {0.370} {\pi*10^{-1}}##

=>L=1.18mI would really appreciate it if you could tell me if what I did is correct.

Thank you very much in advance.
 
Last edited:
  • #20
williamcarter said:
Thank you, yes indeed hi=560. W/m2*K

for ii) I did like this
Qh=mhot*cphot*ΔT=0.24/5*2000*(420-320)
Qh=9600W
##Tcout=Tcin+\frac{Qh} {mcold*cpcold}##
##Tcout=290+\frac{9600} {0.24/5*4180}##
=>Tcout=337.84K

##ΔTlm=\frac{ΔT1-ΔT2} {ln(ΔT1/ΔT2)}##
##ΔTlm=\frac{30-83} {ln(30/83)}##
=>ΔTlm=52.08K

for iii)
ho=4500W/m2*K
hi=560 W/m2*K from i)

##U=\frac{1} {1/hi+1/ho}##
##U=\frac{1} {1/560+1/4500}##

U=497

##Q=U*A*ΔTlm##

=>##A=\frac {Q} {U*ΔTlm}##

##A=\frac {9600} {497*52.08}##

=>A=0.370m m2

but ##A=\pi*D*L##

so ##L=\frac {A} {\pi*D}##

##L=\frac {0.370} {\pi*10^{-1}}##

=>L=1.18mI would really appreciate it if you could tell me if what I did is correct.

Thank you very much in advance.
In part (ii), I would use the total flow rate for both streams. And, in part (iii), I would use that total heat load 9600 x 5 and the total area 5 pi D L. I know that answer comes out the same both ways, but that's how I would do it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: williamcarter

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K