Tunneling through a PE barrier

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kalery
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Barrier Tunneling
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
kalery
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm still in Intro Physics, and I'm a little perplexed by the concept of tunneling. An alpha particle escapes the nucleus by overcoming a potential energy barrier created by Coulombic repulsion with the protons of the nucleus, but this is a spontaneous process and does not require E input, according to my textbook. Energy conservation is violated to allow the alpha particle to move through this E barrier for a brief time interval because unk(E)unk(t) >= hbar. What's going on here... I mean, is this really what happens... How can energy conservation be violated? I thought that despite all the quantum phenomena violating classical Newtonian physics, that energy conservation still is supposed to remain constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Conservation of energy is not violated. What you think is kinetic energy, namely the classical kinetic energy of a point particle as it travels through the barrier, seems to be negative, i.e., [tex]K = E-U(x)[/tex]. The total energy, namely [tex]E[/tex], remains constant, and so conserved.

So now you just need to come to grips with the fact that the kinetic energy is negative. In quantum mechanics, the kinetic energy is an operator acting on a wavefunction, and in 1D is given by [itex]-\hbar^2 \frac{d}{dx}[/itex]. If the kinetic energy is negative, it means that the wavefunction is a growing or (usually) decaying, instead of oscillating. Think of this operator acting on [tex]\psi(x) = e^{-\lambda x}[/tex], versus [tex]\psi(x) = e^{i k x}[/tex].
 
dont understand what is Ibrits talking about... too complex -.-"
What do you mean by kinetic energy is an operator acting on a wavefunction" and "wavefunction is a growing or (usually) decaying, instead of oscillating"?