Turbochargers, what's the diffrence between the turbine and compressor

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the differences between the turbine and compressor in automotive fixed geometry turbochargers. It is established that the compressor is typically larger than the turbine due to factors such as gas speed, blade design, and the nature of the gases involved. The turbine is designed to lower energy while the compressor increases it, making them non-interchangeable components. Additionally, using a turbine as a compressor is inefficient due to its design characteristics, including blade stability and material costs.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of turbocharger components and their functions
  • Knowledge of gas dynamics in turbomachinery
  • Familiarity with centrifugal compressor design principles
  • Basic principles of thermodynamics related to energy conversion
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the design principles of centrifugal compressors
  • Study the thermodynamic cycles involved in turbocharger operation
  • Explore the effects of blade design on turbomachinery performance
  • Learn about the materials used in turbine and compressor construction
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, automotive enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the design and optimization of turbocharger systems.

James125
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone. I'm new to the forum. I'm an engineer...admittedly perhaps not a great one.

I wanted to know about a typical automotive fixed geometry turbocharger. Generally it seems that the compressor is larger than the turbine. Despite being more mass flow on the turbine side. :confused: Why exactly is this?

Also another part to my question - If you used the turbine as a compressor for atmospheric air, what would it's flow and pressure be like? Would it be very inefficient?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi James125!

Some photographs show a larger compressors, others not - comparison not obvious.

Gas speed determines the tip speed of the wheels, not the (marginally different) mass flow. On a centrifugal compressor, gas speed is a bit lower than metal speed, with the blades curved backwards, in order to stabilize the throughput: more flow means less pressure. But on all turbine designs I've seen for turbochargers, gas speed equals metal speed, with blade tips straight. That would be one reason for larger compressors wheels.

More reasons make the comparison difficult.
- Hot exhaust gas gets more easily speed than cold intake air (that's why a gas turbine works).
- The exhaust gas can expand further within the turbine wheel, not just upstream of it.
- The width of the wheels can differ, not just the diameter.

Use the turbine as a compressor: not so good...
- The straight blades give no stability to the mass flow.
- The outlet is a bad intake, with wrong diameter and blade curve
- The turbine's high-temperature material is more expensive!
It's more a question of optimization, but turbomachines need optimization to work.
 
A very informative answer. I have observed that some turbines do have curved blades. If this is the case could the turbine be ran in reverse? So the outlet is the inlet and the blades spin in the opposite direction.

I ask because I am thinking of recycling a turbocharger and using the turbine impeller as a compressor, as I think the compressor impeller is too large for my application.
 
No. A turbine is designed to lower the energy of the air. A compressor increases it.
They are designed for two different things and are not interchangeable.

Just having a "curved blade" is meaningless.
There are critical parameters associated with the twist of the blade, as well as with everything else inside of it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
776
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
752
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K