News Turkey Problems: CNN Update on US Ambassador & Iraq Bombing

[kach22i]

Aw c'mon! Now you're just making stuff up! That second statement just cracks me up!

Iraqi no-fly zones
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_no-fly_zones

What the link above does not tell you is the attacks on ground targets such as convoys by A-10's, F-15's and attack helicopters. There was a case I believe of reporters being killed by mistake in at least one such "friendly fire" incident.

The intent of such air cover was to prevent the slaughter that happened after the first Gulf War under Bush 41/senior. In the south and to the very public and on record urging of George Bush (senior).

NPR did several in depth radio specials on this topic back when Bill Clinton was president.

1991 uprisings in Iraq
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_uprisings_in_Iraq

Although they presented a serious threat to his regime, Iraqi President Saddam Hussein was able to suppress the rebellions with massive force and maintain power, as the expected intervention by the United States never materialized. The uprisings were eventually crushed by the Iraqi Republican Guard, followed by mass reprisals and intensified forced relocation of Marsh Arabs, including draining of the marshlands. In few weeks tens of thousands of civilians were killed.

I don't need to make anything up, the truth is quite gruesome enough.

 

[chemisttree]

True, but you have to admit the Kurds had a good thing with the "NO-FLY-ZONE" enforced and Saddam not allowed to take troops into the area for fear of US air strikes.

The no fly zone had absolutely nothing to do with forbidding Saddam from moving military forces into the northern Kurdish areas of Iraq. In fact he did just that. He established antiaircraft positions in the north and south zones and routinely shot at US warplanes patrolling the zone.

According to two State Department reports in 1994 and 1996, the creation and military enforcement of the "no-fly zone" in fact did not protect the Iraqi Kurdish populations from potential assaults by Iraqi forces, which--after crushing the March 1991 rebellion--had pulled back and were focused on post-war reconstruction and protecting the regime in Baghdad. In addition, the straight latitudinal demarcations of the no-fly zone did not correspond with the areas of predominant Kurdish populations, excluding large Kurdish-populated areas which had previously been subjected to air attacks (such as Hallabja) and including predominantly Arab areas which had not been a target of Iraqi government forces. Seeing what had began as an apparent humanitarian effort evolve into an excuse for continuing a low-level war against Iraq, France soon dropped out of the enforcement efforts.

At the end of August 1996, factional fighting broke out between the PUK and the KDP in Iraqi Kurdistan. Concerned about possible advances by the Iranian-backed PUK, tens of thousands of Iraqi forces headed north in an effort to force PUK militiamen out of the key northern city of Irbil. In response, President Bill Clinton ordered a series of major bombing raids and missile attacks against Iraq. Despite concerns over the illegality of this unilateral intervention and the possibility of becoming embroiled in an inter-Kurdish conflict, the American air and missile strikes received widespread bipartisan support in Washington. This supposed rush to the defense of the Kurds may have been just a pretext, however: while the incursion by Iraqi government forces took place in the north, most of the U.S. strikes took place in the central and southern part of Iraq--hundreds of miles from the Iraqi advance.

http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/4670

The no fly zone in the north was originally authorized by the UN to prevent Iraq from interfering with humanitarian air drops to the tens of thousands fleeing toward the Turkish border. These Kurds were alone in the freezing mountains without shelter having fled persecution in Iraq and were turned back at the Turkish border.

 

[kach22i]

The no fly zone had absolutely nothing to do with forbidding Saddam from moving military forces into the northern Kurdish areas of Iraq.

No massive troop movements would be tollerated and no moving of anti-aircraft missiles.....sounds like "military forces" were limited in their movements to me, very limited.

I'll admit that I don't know the exact language of the resolutions and agreements which were enforced or supposed to be enforced in regards to Saddam. The actual way things were practiced and unfolded are far more telling than pieces of ignored paper anyway.

 

[EnumaElish]

ISTANBUL, Turkey - Kurdish rebels released eight Turkish soldiers in northern Iraq on Sunday two weeks after they were captured in a deadly ambush that intensified pressure on the Turkish government to attack the guerrillas in Iraq.

The release comes on the eve of a meeting between Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan and President Bush in Washington to agree on measures against the rebels, and avert a cross-border offensive into a relatively stable part of Iraq.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071104/ap_on_re_mi_ea/turkey_soldiers

 

[kach22i]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071104/ap_on_re_mi_ea/turkey_soldiers

"We released these soldiers to make clear that we want to solve the Kurdish problem with peaceful means and methods."

Not the words of a typical "terrorist organization".

Will the PKK keep a low profile until things blow over and then go back to killing Turks?

It's hard to be on either side, hope they can stop killing each other for a while.

 

[verafloyd]

Not the words of a typical "terrorist organization".

And this is "proving" that the PKK is not a terrorist organization? Cool. So basically what you're saying is that it's ok to kill innocent civillians, trade heroin, set villages on fire, foray hospitals and schools to take doctors and teachers out to kill them before the eyes of all the civillians around, destroy the factories in the region, etc. as long as you keep saying the same nursery rhyme "the PKK wants to solve the Kurdish problem with peaceful means and methods", right?

The one and only truth about the PKK is that they were once founded as a political organisation but after 23 years they turned into a giant terrorist organisation responsible for the death of more than 35,000 Kurdish and Turkish people. They don't care about the Kurdish people living in the South-Eastern Turkey.

If they did, they wouldn't damage the development of the region by sabotaging the infrastructure and economically important facilities.

If they did, they wouldn't force the people to give their property holdings to the PKK.

If they did, they wouldn't kill the doctors who heal the people there for free.

If they did, they wouldn't kill the teachers who work hard to take the people of the region to a better future.

If they did, they wouldn't poison the fresh water supplies of a whole city.

If they did, they wouldn't kill the sisters and brothers of Kurdish people who refuse to join that terrorist organisation.

If they did, they wouldn't form mine fields next to the cities.

What the PKK care about is the money as big as $86 million annual that they make out of heroin, weapons and burglary.

You don't agree? Then you tell me what the PKK did for the good of Kurdish people.

 

[kach22i]

And this is "proving" that the PKK is not a terrorist organization?

No, not at all.

The list of terrible things the PKK has been doing is similar to what the Turkish govenment has been doing to the Kurds, so much so that I had to do a double take. Using that logic the USA should declare the current Turkish govenment a terrorist organization.

There are no clean hands in this situation, no right side, no 100% wrong side.

Like I said before I can't be on either side and the whole thing is a shame.

 

[verafloyd]

The list of terrible things the PKK has been doing is similar to what the Turkish govenment has been doing to the Kurds

Excuse me, is it me or are you claiming that the Turkish government has been doing things like sabotaging the infrastructure that it has spent a fortune to built, been killing the doctors and teachers it has raised and sent to the region to heal and educate the people there, been poisoning the fresh water supplies of its own people (and the army for your record), been killing the people who refuses to join -let's say- the army, been forming mine fields next to places where its own citizens live, and been trading heroin?!? :!)

And still you are saying that you're on neither side? How else can someone be on one side! Please don't think that people following this thread are fools or something. You're constantly against Turkey. You certainly have the right to do that. But at least keep to your thoughts.

Also, I'm waiting for your answer to the question I asked in my previous post:

You don't agree? Then you tell me what the PKK did for the good of Kurdish people.

Regards,
verafloyd

 

[kach22i]

First off I never said that the PKK has does any good for anyone.

Secondly NPR has been following the situation for years. Anyone who has turned on their radio may of caught the same news coverage as myself.

In short the Turkish government has...

1. Ordered whole Kurdish villages in eastern Turkey to clear out so that the area may be purged. Wiping entire communities off the map as if they never existed is sanctioned Turkish policy. Sometimes without any warning (middle of the night) the Turkish troops with buldozers have leveled homes with families still in them. If this sounds bad, remember that Isreal has been reported to do the same and the US in Iraq as well. The intent is to eliminate terrorist support network, it's an ugly business no matter who does it.

2. When giving fair warning does not seem to work with the Kurds, the Turks have resorted to blowing up dams to flood an occupied valley killing hundereds in the process. If the govenment wishes to claim/reclaim an area or rid it of Kurds they have the right to do so, or so they tell the western powers.

The list is really too long, I have to get some work done....look it up.

No clean hands on this one like I keep saying.

 

[verafloyd]

Ordered whole Kurdish villages in eastern Turkey to clear out so that the area may be purged. Wiping entire communities off the map as if they never existed is sanctioned Turkish policy.

In my hometown, which is in the Eastern Anatolia, there are at least seven villages next to my village within a range of say 2 kms. 3 of those villages have purely Kurdish population, majority of some other one is Kurdish and in the rest of the villages either the majority is Turkish or Turks and Kurds are in almost equal numbers. None of the Kurdish villages have ever been cleared out as you claimed. Many Kurdish villages have been left by their residents during the era 1984-1997 due to terrorism but what you "forget to mention" -as you always do- is that the Turks had to leave their villages, too. It is not surprising as it's not easy to leave if everyday you have to think what to do when in the middle of the night a PKK terrorist come to your home to ask for food, money, or your boy/girl or they destroy any form of improvement in your city to claim that the government is not working at all despite the fact that the amount of government investment per capita in Northern Turkey is much more lower than that in the east of Turkey.

Sometimes without any warning (middle of the night) the Turkish troops with buldozers have leveled homes with families still in them.

Yeah, then the Turkish troops used their laser guns to blow all that is still alive and then an army of orcs and uruks marched singing songs of victory!

Are you kidding? Are you aware that you are accusing a whole nation with made-up events? Please share with us any evidence you have. Do you really think that 70 million Turks and Kurds would just sit in silence of their home if the Turkish army were to do such an abject thing? What you can't understand is that the Turks and Kurds have been living in these realms for many hundred years in peace. The PKK is a terrorist organisation that have been used by different forces to destabilize the region and destroy the peace. Their revenue of $80 million annual is a proof of that. If the PKK's purpose was to give the Kurds a better future they could have used that money for the good of the Kurds, not for making their leaders richer.

the Turks have resorted to blowing up dams to flood an occupied valley killing hundereds in the process.

Of course! Turkey is such a rich country that blowing dams up to kill people is a nice way to have some fun. I'm now sure that you are actually kidding. Speaking of the dams, you, again, didn't know that the most expensive investment in the history of Turkish Republic is the South-Eastern Project (GAP in Turkish, if you happen to want to google it), did you?. Let me tell before you ask, my friend, it was not a defense project to build the ultimate gun to kill all the Kurds there and left the Turks alive. It is the largest dam in Turkey and thanks to it the south-east of Turkey is now capable of aqueus agriculture (if it's the word). And guess who have kept sabotaging the project for years! (Hint: No, not the government.)

The list is really too long, I have to get some work done

Please don't hesitate to share your made-up stories with us when you finish making up them.

EDIT: I realized that the last 6 posts are by you and me. I don't want to turn this topic into a discussion between you and I only. If you like we can continue the discussion through pms.

 

[kach22i]

NPR:
AN OPEN PRISON...says NPR reporter when describing eastern "Kurdish" Turkey.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15926809

More:
http://www.npr.org/search.php?text=kurds+turkey

Go back a few years, past the recent crisis, the truth shall be known.

Oh, and when the reporter says that the Turkish govenment "blew it" when the head of the PKK was caught and convicted back in 1999, that it was a chance for peace. What he meant to say is the the head of the PKK told his fighters to lay down their arms and go home, and do not fight anymore. In exchange the head of the PKK would spend the rest of his life in a Turkish prison (how lovely). The govenment then executed him and stepped up the persecution campaign of terror against the Kurds. They "blew it" alright.

 

[EnumaElish]

Oh, and when the reporter says that the Turkish govenment "blew it" when the head of the PKK was caught and convicted back in 1999, that it was a chance for peace. What he meant to say is the the head of the PKK told his fighters to lay down their arms and go home, and do not fight anymore. In exchange the head of the PKK would spend the rest of his life in a Turkish prison (how lovely). The govenment then executed him and stepped up the persecution campaign of terror against the Kurds. They "blew it" alright.

No, he is alive, under solitary confinement in a maximum security prison in Turkey. A lot of people would have liked to see him executed but had to contend themselves with wishing him a long life.

I think the latest flare up should be seen within the context of significant political gains that Kurdish political candidates and parties showed in the last parliamentary election. I think right now the essential chasm is the one between those (Kurds and Turks) who believe in the democratic - constitutional - political process, and others who don't.

 

[kach22i]

I think right now the essential chasm is the one between those (Kurds and Turks) who believe in the democratic - constitutional - political process, and others who don't.

I'd like to hear from a Kurd who is living in that area on that. That comment about it being "an open prison" is not very encouraging.

Abdullah Ocalan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdullah_Öcalan

Since his capture Öcalan has been held under solitary confinement as the only prisoner on the İmralı Island in the Turkish Sea of Marmara. Despite the fact that all other prisoners formerly at İmralı were transferred to other prisons, there are still over 1000 Turkish military personnel stationed there guarding him. He was sentenced to death, but this sentence was commuted to life-long aggravated imprisonment when the death penalty was abolished in Turkey in August 2002.[15] No one has been executed in Turkey since 1984.[16]

He was sentenced to death...not executed, my mistake.

History lesson:
http://www.answers.com/topic/ottoman-wars-in-europe?cat=technology

 

[EnumaElish]

I'd like to hear from a Kurd who is living in that area on that.

Fair. But the election results are there, and my point is, they may have turned out to be more, not less, of a reason to re-ignite armed conflict in the region.

History lesson:
http://www.answers.com/topic/ottoman-wars-in-europe?cat=technology

Did you mean this as a commentary on Kurds, or more generally?

 

[kach22i]

Fair. But the election results are there, and my point is, they may have turned out to be more, not less, of a reason to re-ignite armed conflict in the region.Did you mean this as a commentary on Kurds, or more generally?

Who's election results?

That link was just to remind us of some history, when Turkey is prevented from going west (entry into the EU this time) it attacks to the east. Not much has changed culturally in hundreds of years.

The links below mention regions in Turkey and minorities I have not even heard of before, I am far from being an expert on the topic or that region, but I can read and learn.

Kurds, Turks and the Alevi revival in Turkey
http://www.let.uu.nl/~Martin.vanBruinessen/personal/publications/Alevi_revival.htm

DESTRUCTION OF KURDISH VILLAGES
http://users.westnet.gr/~cgian/villages.htm

Backgrounder on Repression of the Kurds in Turkey
http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/eca/turkey/kurd.htm

Due to obstacles to reporting from the emergency region, the program of village destruction has gone underreported in the Turkish and world press.

It is said the Kurds have no friends, Turkey should be careful not to give them too much western sympathy because of their military actions.

 

[EnumaElish]

Who's election results?

Press Release

Turkish Elections

History in the Making

Since 1994 Kurdish politicians have been unable to win any seats in Turkish Parliament, because of the 10% barrier. Based on Turkish laws, to win seats in parliament a party must have a minimum of 10% of the national vote. The Kurdish parties failed to attain the 10% required by law.

However, in this recent election the Democratic Society Party (DTP) successfully managed to go around this law by asking their candidates to participate in the election as independents. Although the Kurds should be represented by 25-30% of the representatives, Kurdish candidates won 20 seats, a number great enough to create the first Kurdish block in Turkish parliament.

The success serves as an important test of the democratic environment in Turkey for both DTP and the Turkish public's political maturity.

...

We anticipate that their presence in the Turkish parliament will bring new hope and changes; where the voice of our nation will be heard clearly to bring changes to the Turkish constitution democratically ...

http://www.kncna.org/docs/k_viewarticle.asp?date=8/1/2007

I reitereate my earlier point: the deeper divide right now is between individuals (Turks and Kurds) who believe in the constitutional democratic processes and those who don't believe in them and who may attempt to sabotage them.

EURASIA INSIGHT

TURKEY: KURDISH PARTY PREPARES FOR RETURN TO PARLIAMENT

Yigal Schleifer 7/27/07

Using a successful campaign strategy that saw all its candidates running as independents in order to circumvent Turkey’s high election threshold, the pro-Kurdish Democratic Society Party (DTP) managed to get 22 of its members elected in the recent Turkish elections, enough to allow the stealth candidates to regroup in parliament under their party’s banner.

Although some forecasts had predicted the party winning as many as 35 seats in the July 22 election, the seats won represent the largest electoral victory ever by a Kurdish party and the first time a pro-Kurdish party will sit in parliament since 1991.

The victory, analysts say, serves as an important test of both the party’s and the Turkish public’s political maturity. It will also present a good opportunity for making progress in resolving the lingering Kurdish problem. [For background see the Eurasia Insight archive].

"If we had from an earlier date allowed the Kurds representation in parliament, I think we would have been much more successful in integrating the Kurdish demands into the parliamentary process, so this is a new window of opportunity to do that," says Sahin Alpay, a professor of political science at Istanbul’s Bahcesehir University. "But there is also a risk of them becoming a source of conflict in the parliament."

Added Alpay: "The fact that their views and demands will be heard in parliament is a welcome thing. … It’s another important step forward towards the consolidation of the democratization of Turkey."

The DTP’s presence in parliament, though small, is certain to test Turkish public attitudes, especially coming at a time when the separatist Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) has been increasing its attacks against security forces in Turkey’s predominantly-Kurdish southeast, and the Turkish military has threatened to invade northern Iraq to go after the organization’s bases there. ...

http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav072707a.shtml

That link was just to remind us of some history, when Turkey is prevented from going west (entry into the EU this time) it attacks to the east.

That's an incisive insight. IMO it is an argument for backing Turkey's EU membership, although you may feel differently.

 

[kach22i]

RE:
http://www.eurasianet.org/index.shtml

Interesting news site, I've bookmarked it.

Until today by reading the articles posted, I did not even know how the Kurds got representation and the 10% law.

Progress is slow moving but it happens sometimes.

 

[EnumaElish]

Turkey seeks arrest of rebel commanders

...

On Monday, President Bush met Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Washington and promised him that the United States would share military intelligence in the hunt for PKK rebels. Turkey credited U.S. help in the 1999 capture in Kenya of Abdullah Ocalan, the founder of the PKK who is now serving a life sentence on a prison island in Turkey.

Without providing names, the Pentagon also has said 10 PKK members are in a U.S. "most-wanted" database, meaning American forces have had standing orders for some time to pick them up if they are found. Citing Iraqi officials, Turkish media have said Turkey delivered a list of 150 alleged PKK members to Iraq and demanded their extradition.

The PKK, which launched guerrilla warfare in 1984, started out with a Marxist ideology mixed with Kurdish nationalism, but it later softened its demands and dropped the idea of an independent homeland. The rebels now say they seek more rights for Turkey's Kurdish minority, which lives primarily in the country's southeast and in immigrant communities in large cities.

The United States and Europe label the PKK as a terrorist organization. Turkey dismisses the group as a murderous gang and refuses to negotiate with it.

Ocalan drew comparisons with Stalin for his harsh control over the group, often killing or imprisoning members who deviated from his edicts. ...

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071107/ap_on_re_mi_ea/turkey_rebel_leaders

 

[Art]

I wonder if this could develop into a civil war in Turkey? Albeit probably fairly one-sided as the Kurds are such a minority though the Islamic factor could complicate things making it a 3 way conflict.

BBC NEWS
Cold welcome for freed Turkish soldiers
By Sarah Rainsford
BBC News, Istanbul

The release of eight soldiers after two weeks held hostage by the PKK has not been celebrated in Turkey.

Some here have branded them cowards - even traitors.

Justice Minister Mehmet Ali Sahin told an audience at Ankara University on Monday that he could not be entirely happy about the soldiers' release.

They were captured in an ambush by the PKK close to the Iraqi border on 21 October. Twelve other soldiers were killed in what was the worst clash of its kind with Kurdish separatists in many years.

"No member of the Turkish armed forces should have found themselves in such a situation," the minister began.
<snip>
Unlike recent hostage crises involving Israeli and British military members, here in Turkey the government, military and media played this one very low-key.

One explanation is concern, in the current nationalistic climate, about the potential for clashes between Turks and Kurds in Turkish cities.
<snip>
n a further blow to Turkish pride, pictures from the handover of the eight soldiers have now made their way into local newspapers.

They show three members of the Turkish parliament from the pro-Kurdish DTP party standing beside a poster of Abdullah Ocalan, the imprisoned PKK founder. In others, the MPs are seen greeting the hostage-takers with handshakes and kisses.

Though the DTP insist they were present for humanitarian reasons, to aid the soldiers' release, they are now being investigated on suspicion of supporting a terrorist organisation.

 

[EnumaElish]

I wonder if this could develop into a civil war in Turkey? Albeit probably fairly one-sided as the Kurds are such a minority though the Islamic factor could complicate things making it a 3 way conflict.

Is what you are asking "can/will Turks massacre Turkey's Kurds?"

 

[Art]

Is what you are asking "can/will Turks massacre Turkey's Kurds?"

I'm not suggesting they would set out with that as a premeditated goal but I could see how it could end up that way through a process of escalation. Civil wars are notoriously nasty.

 

[EnumaElish]

The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), whose bases in north Iraq Turkey has threatened to attack, said on Friday it was open to a dialogue that could lead to its downing arms, a news agency close to the rebels reported.

Turkey, like the United States and the European Union, condemns the PKK as a terrorist group and has always refused to talk to PKK guerrillas. It had no immediate response to the party's statement, carried by the Firat news agency.

"We are open to dialogue on starting a process that would totally exclude weapons, based on a political project," the PKK statement said.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071109/wl_nm/turkey_iraq_pkk_dc

 

[kach22i]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071109/wl_nm/turkey_iraq_pkk_dc

TUNCELI, Turkey (Reuters) - The Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK), whose bases in north Iraq Turkey has threatened to attack, said on Friday it was open to a dialogue that could lead to its downing arms, a news agency close to the rebels reported.

Terrorist laying down their arms?

The end must be near.

 

[EnumaElish]

Eight Turkish soldiers freed last week by Kurdish rebels have been charged by the military with disobeying orders in a way that could have led to "catastrophe," a defense lawyer said on Sunday.

...

The soldiers have faced criticism at home since their return and have been accused by some of aiding PKK propaganda.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071111/wl_nm/turkey_military_soldiers_dc

 

[kishtik]

I reitereate my earlier point: the deeper divide right now is between individuals (Turks and Kurds) who believe in the constitutional democratic processes and those who don't believe in them and who may attempt to sabotage them.

That is a valid point. On one hand, we have people who want to close DTP, on the other hand, DTP does not pronounce PKK as a terrorist organization.

 

[EnumaElish]

That is a valid point. On one hand, we have people who want to close DTP, on the other hand, DTP does not pronounce PKK as a terrorist organization.

I think I agree with the Turkish Prime Minister when he says that DTP should be free to carry on its politics within constitutional limits.

 

[kach22i]

Dang, this is no good.

You know why Turkey would not let the US military pass though that corner of Iraq for the invasion?

As NPR reported at the time and with audiotapes; Turkey had 60,000 troops already there to prevent waves of refugees, which massed there in the first Gulf War.

What was on the audiotape was the sound of Turkish attack helicopters attacking Kurds on the Iraqi side of the border. No one really knew if it was PKK positions or just Iraqi civilians, everyone in town with a gun shot up to the sky to ward off the attacks just the same.

Also reported at the time of the US invasion was that in Iraq at an abandoned airbase there were as many as 100 Turkish tanks standing by. Some think just to intimidate the PKK; others think to stand off the possibility of tens of thousands of fleeing refugees.

No Turkish officials would comment, but Turkish families said their sons had been sent into Iraq and stationed there.

This operation is much more open and meant as a political statement.

UPDATE: 12/18/2007
Turkish army sends soldiers into Iraq
By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071218/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq

It was not clear how long the Turkish soldiers who entered Iraq on Tuesday would stay, but a Turkish government official said they were sent as "reinforcements" to existing Turkish troops stationed further inside Iraq.

"They are going there as reinforcements, they are not returning," the official said on condition of anonymity as he was not authorized to speak to the media.

About 1,200 Turkish military monitors have operated in northern Iraq since 1996 with permission from local authorities. A tank battalion has been stationed at a former airport at the border town of Bamerni and a few other military outposts were scattered in the region. Ankara rotates the troops there.

Everything I said has been proven true and accurate. I just did not recall the name of the border town of "Bamerni". Maybe the name of the town was never in the original radio report on NPR a few years ago, don't know, and not a major issue.

 

[EnumaElish]

Apparently today's border-crossing operation has been withdrawn.

Officials: Turkey withdraws from Iraq

By YAHYA BARZANJI, Associated Press Writer 9 minutes ago

KIRKUK, Iraq - Turkey sent hundreds of troops about 1 1/2 miles into northern Iraq early Tuesday in an operation against Kurdish rebels but then withdrew them later in the day, Kurdish officials said.

Jamal Abdullah, a spokesman for the regional Kurdistan government, told The Associated Press that the Turkish troops had withdrawn in the evening.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071218/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AiT7JYPAyLyJuDbRjpr3qoNvaA8F

 

[kach22i]

Apparently today's border-crossing operation has been withdrawn.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071218/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AiT7JYPAyLyJuDbRjpr3qoNvaA8F

We only know what they tell us.

Looks like the original 12,000 troops and all those tanks are still there.

Right?

 

[EnumaElish]

We only know what they tell us.

Looks like the original 12,000 troops and all those tanks are still there.

Right?

I thought you posted 1,200. Is it 12,000? Or 1,200?

Regardless, the article you posted said they are there "with permission from local authorities."