Turning 2nd order into 1st order

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WelshDave
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Turning
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around transforming a second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) into a first-order ODE using a substitution. Participants explore the mathematical steps involved in solving the equation, which models a physical system influenced by gravity and damping forces.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the original second-order ODE and seeks help in transforming it into a first-order equation using the substitution \( v = \frac{dh}{dt} \).
  • Another participant clarifies that using the substitution leads to a first-order ODE of the form \( \frac{dv}{dt} + \frac{1}{m}v = -g \).
  • A different participant suggests a separable ODE approach and proposes a modified equation \( \frac{dv}{dt} + \frac{k}{m}v = -g \), indicating the values of \( k \) and \( m \).
  • Further elaboration on the integrating factor method is provided, leading to a general solution for \( v(t) \) and a specific form based on initial conditions.
  • Participants compare their results, noting a small discrepancy in the constants used in their solutions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the transformation of the second-order ODE into a first-order form and the use of integrating factors. However, there is a minor disagreement regarding the specific constants in the final expressions for \( v(t) \), indicating that multiple interpretations or calculations may exist.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions regarding the physical context of the problem and the definitions of variables may not be fully articulated. The discussion also reflects varying approaches to solving the ODE, which could lead to different interpretations of the results.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in differential equations, particularly in the context of physics applications, may find this discussion beneficial. It may also appeal to those studying mathematical modeling of physical systems.

WelshDave
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Good day all

I am struggling with this one.

m (d^2 h)/(dt^2 )+k dh/dt=-mg

use v=dh/dt in place to turn 2nd order into 1st order

so from this i have got

(d^2 h)/(dt^2 )= -g-(v/m)

Is this a first order equation? If so can somebody point me to solve the equation when m=80, k=8.7, v(0)=0ms-1.

Any pointers/ help would be most welcome.

thanks Dave
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are going to use:

$$\frac{dh}{dt}=v$$

then:

$$\frac{d^2h}{dt^2}=\frac{dv}{dt}$$

And your original ODE becomes (after dividing through by $m$):

$$\frac{dv}{dt}+\frac{1}{m}v=-g$$

This is now a first order ODE and you can use an integrating factor to solve.
 
I've used the formula

N(y)dy=M(X)dx first order separable ODE

dvdt+(1/m)v=−g

I'm guessing that should be

dv/dt+(k/m)v= -g

k=8.7
m= 80
v(0)=0

worked out a long formula and got,

v(t)= -1/87e^-(87t/800)(7848e^(87t/800)-7848)

Can you advise it that is correct. I looks right to me.
 
Okay, we have (I left off $k$ before):

$$\frac{dv}{dt}+\frac{k}{m}v=-g$$

If we multiply through by an integrating factor of:

$$\mu(t)=e^{\frac{kt}{m}}$$

We then obtain:

$$e^{\frac{kt}{m}}\frac{dv}{dt}+\frac{k}{m}e^{\frac{kt}{m}}v=-ge^{\frac{kt}{m}}$$

The LHS may now be rewritten as the derivative of a product:

$$\frac{d}{dt}\left(e^{\frac{kt}{m}}v\right)=-ge^{\frac{kt}{m}}$$

Integrating through w.r.t $t$, there results:

$$e^{\frac{kt}{m}}v=C-\frac{mg}{k}e^{\frac{kt}{m}}$$

Hence:

$$v(t)=Ce^{-\frac{kt}{m}}-\frac{mg}{k}$$

Now, if we take $v(0)=v_0$, we find:

$$C-\frac{mg}{k}=v_0\implies C=v_0+\frac{mg}{k}$$

And so we now have:

$$v(t)=\left(v_0+\frac{mg}{k}\right)e^{-\frac{kt}{m}}-\frac{mg}{k}$$

Now, plugging in for the given constants we find:

$$v(t)=\frac{7840}{87}\left(e^{-\frac{87t}{800}}-1\right)$$

This is close to what you have...you have 7848 where I have 7840. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K