Can Reversing an Airfoil on a Prop Plane Still Create Lift?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter udtsith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Airfoil Turning
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Reversing the wing of a standard propeller plane can still generate lift under specific conditions, particularly with the right angle of attack. However, this configuration is likely to lead to flow separation, which diminishes lift efficiency. A well-designed airfoil, such as the LRN1007 tested by Dr. Michael Selig, balances lift generation and drag reduction. Subsonic airfoils typically feature a tapered trailing edge to minimize turbulent wake and enhance lift through effective circulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of airfoil design principles
  • Knowledge of angle of attack and its effects on lift
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number and its significance in aerodynamics
  • Basic concepts of drag and lift in fluid dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the aerodynamic properties of the LRN1007 airfoil
  • Study the effects of angle of attack on lift generation
  • Explore the design features of subsonic airfoils and their performance
  • Investigate the principles of flow separation and its impact on aircraft performance
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, aviation enthusiasts, and students studying aerodynamics will benefit from this discussion, particularly those interested in airfoil design and performance optimization.

udtsith
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Hi was trying to figure out what would happen if you reversed the wing of a standard prop plane? for example...the thinner wedge is towards the front. Would you still get lift? I suppose not since there is a reason the rounded/thicker edge is facing towards the front. but why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
udtsith said:
Would you still get lift?
With the right angle of attack, yes. But the flow would be more likely to separate.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
A flat plate can be an airfoil at an angle of attack.
 
There is more to a wing than just to provide Lift. A well designed wing profile provides lift yet it also keeps the Drag low.
 
Actually, due to the rounded side being in the back, you may or may not generate lift (or at least very little) depending on where separation occurs.
 
Vintage aircrafts can easily fly on their back. And on youtube I saw a test pilot flying a barrel roll with a 707.
Aerodynamics of aircrafts are a rather complicated issue.
 
A sharp leading edge (LE) can work at very low Reynold's numbers. Dr. Michael Selig tested the LRN1007 airfoil and it performed well.

There are airfoils with a sharp LE and blunt trailing edge (TE), e.g. X-15, but they're designed for supersonic operation. Subsonic airfoils have a tapered trailing edge that comes to a sharp point in order to avoid a turbulent wake and associated bluff body drag.
 

Attachments

  • lrn1007.jpg
    lrn1007.jpg
    2.2 KB · Views: 577
That's not why typical subsonic airfoils come to a point (or at least not the primary reason). See, for example, flatback airfoils commonly found on wind turbines. It's primary purpose is actually setting the rear stagnation point so that a net circulation can develop around the airfoil and lift can be generated. Any reduction in the turbulence of the wake is a bonus.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K