Tutorial on Friction Coefficient Formulas & Applications

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding friction coefficients and their applications in physics problems, particularly in scenarios involving inclined planes and stopping distances for vehicles. Participants are exploring the calculations related to friction and acceleration in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to apply friction coefficient formulas to calculate acceleration and stopping distances. Questions arise regarding the correct application of these formulas, particularly in relation to the normal force and unit conversions.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various attempts to solve the problems presented, with some participants providing guidance on necessary calculations and assumptions. There is an acknowledgment of potential errors in unit conversions and the importance of significant figures in the final answers.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of mass in the initial problem statements and the need to convert speeds from kilometers per hour to meters per second for accurate calculations. There is a sense of urgency as some participants are working against a deadline for submission.

rculley1970
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Is there a link someone can provide that has a good tutorial on friction coefficient formulas and when to apply them. I seem to be having problems with this topic.

Everyone knows the old M1 and M2 connected by a string and pully question. That is on a level surface. But if the surface is tilted backward so the corner now makes a 53 degree angle instead of 90 how do I go about finding the acceleration. Is it the same way as before but with something else added into it besides the kinetic friction?

I have been working on physics all day and my brain is about to boil over.

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
problem:

a car is traveling at 65.0km/h on a flat highway. coefficient of friction between road and tires is 0.15, what is the minimum distance in which the car will stop.

I am assuming that I start out with:
.15(9.8)=a which = 1.47m/s^2

plug that into:
V^2=V0^2+2a(deltaX) and solve for deltaX.

is this a fairly accurate way to solve it?
 
I come up with:

a=1.47m/s^2
deltaX = 1437 m
 
rculley1970 said:
problem:

a car is traveling at 65.0km/h on a flat highway. coefficient of friction between road and tires is 0.15, what is the minimum distance in which the car will stop.

I am assuming that I start out with:
.15(9.8)=a which = 1.47m/s^2

plug that into:
V^2=V0^2+2a(deltaX) and solve for deltaX.

is this a fairly accurate way to solve it?

Wait a minute! Hold the Ferrari! The unit police are here!

In order to calculate the force due to friction you need a normal force. You said:
I am assuming that I start out with:
.15(9.8)=a which = 1.47m/s^2

I presume the 9.8 is g, but g has units of acceleration, not force! The normal force in this case, all things like wind resistance etc. being neglected, will be mg. Try using a round figure for the mass, such as 1500 kg maybe? (My estimates for masses are never great, but I think that's reasonable.)

Other than that, you're golden.

-Dan
 
The problem does not show any mass. The equation I get out of the book is:

(coefficient of k)(g)=a

Therefore, from the only given data from the problem:

(.15)(9.8) = a = 1.47m/s^2
 
Is that the correct answer for the problem? I have been working it out but putting it into the online answer form keeps saying it is wrong. For the friction of .15 I am getting a stopping distance of 1438 m. The problem asks for the answer in 3 significant figures only. I can't figure this out.

Please help.
 
i don't know if it's the right answer, but if you only need 3 significant figures, you're going to need to get rid of the 8. Round to the nearest 10 and you get 1440 m. (which has 3 sigfigs)
 
actually, it's the wrong answer. notice that the speed of the car is given in kilometers per hour, while your calculations are in meters per second. so, you should first convert the kilometers per hour to meters per second, and then do the problem
 
no, that didn't work. I think it's the answer. I am doing something wrong but can't figure it out. I have to submit the work in 30 minutes so i guess I will leave it blank and find out the hard way.
 
  • #10
did you see my post just now?
 
  • #11
I just did, recalculated, and it worked. Thank you very much andrew. I can't believe it was such a small detail that turned it into such a huge problem. Once again, thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K