Two Block Problem: Solving for Forces (Parts b & c)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZanyCat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the Two Block Problem in physics, specifically parts (b) and (c). The user initially calculated the force between two blocks, denoted as 'z', and found it to be 1.1N for part (a). For part (b), they reasoned that the system is in equilibrium with forces of 3.2N acting on the larger mass, leading to a calculated 'z' of 3.2N. The confusion arises regarding the expected force of 2.1N, prompting a clarification on the application of forces in the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Knowledge of equilibrium in mechanical systems
  • Ability to solve simultaneous equations
  • Familiarity with force diagrams and free-body diagrams
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Newton's second law and its application in multi-body systems
  • Study equilibrium conditions for systems with multiple forces
  • Practice solving simultaneous equations in physics problems
  • Explore free-body diagram techniques for visualizing forces
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding force interactions in multi-body systems.

ZanyCat
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
g3KVyFa.png


I'm sure you guys have never answered a physics question involving two blocks before :P

My question is regarding parts (b) and, by extension, (c).

For part (a), I called the force between the two blocks 'z' and solved [tex]\frac{F - z}{m1} = \frac{z}{m2}[/tex] which gave me z = 1.1N, which was correct.

Conceptually for part (b), I imagined the two blocks as one system. Two forces are acting on the system in opposite directions and they have the same magnitude, so the system is in equilibirum and not accelerating. Now considering just the large mass, this must be in equilibrium also, as it must not be accelerating either. Thus to oppose the F force pushing right, the z force 'pushing' left on it from the smaller block must have the same magnitude as F, 3.2N.
When I solved a pair of simultaneous equations again, I also ended up with z = 3.2N.

So where is my thinking wrong? Where does the 2.1N come from?

Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In part (b), I think they mean that the force is removed from m1 and applied to m2, so there is only 1 force acting.
 
ap123 said:
In part (b), I think they mean that the force is removed from m1 and applied to m2, so there is only 1 force acting.
Right, otherwise the problem does not make sense.
You can calculate the force as in (a).
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K