hello everybody(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

i hope i make this clear and to the point. there is an integral that is bothering me. i will express it as the combination of 2 integration formulas that you can look up, under logarithmic functions (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_integrals_of_logarithmic_functions) [Broken]. here are two identities from that list:

[tex]\int \ln(cx) dx = x\ln(cx) - x[/tex]

and

[tex]\int \ln(ax + b) dx = x\ln(ax + b) - x + (b/a)\ln(ax + b) [/tex]

I have an equation(it actually comes from a famous paper in physics) that basically represents the difference between the two. To make things simpler, a = c = 1 in my equation.

So I have:

(1) [tex]\int \ln(x + b) dx - \int \ln(x) dx[/tex]

using the identities I have:

[tex]x\ln(x + b) - x + (b)\ln(x + b) - x\ln(x) + x[/tex]

[tex]x\ln(x + b) + (b)\ln(x + b) - x\ln(x)[/tex]

[tex](x + b)\ln(x + b) - x\ln(x)[/tex]

so that's that. Now let me do it slightly differently(and don't ask why):

I will factor out the 'b' from the equation first (1):

(2) [tex]\int \ln[(x/b + 1)*(b)] dx - \int \ln[(x/b)*b] dx[/tex]

[tex]\int \ln[(x/b + 1) + ln(b)] dx - \int \ln[(x/b) + ln(b)] dx[/tex]

[tex]\int \ln(x/b + 1) dx - \int \ln(x/b)dx + \int ln(b)dx - \int ln(b)dx] dx[/tex]

[tex]\int \ln(x/b + 1) dx - \int \ln(x/b) dx[/tex]

using the same identities

[tex]x\ln(x/b + 1) - x + b\ln(x/b + 1) - x\ln(x/b) + x[/tex]

[tex]x\ln(x/b + 1) + b\ln(x/b + 1) - x\ln(x/b)[/tex]

[tex](x + b)\ln(x/b + 1) - x\ln(x/b)[/tex]

this is now a different result from approach (1). You can't, unless I'm wrong, recover it again by resubstituting the factor b in again.

My question: why does this simple factoring out, change the answer here?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Two different results for the same integral

Loading...

Similar Threads - different results same | Date |
---|---|

I Vector Laplacian: different results in different coordinates | Jul 24, 2016 |

Limit in two variables polar vs cartisiean differ in result | Nov 5, 2012 |

Indefinite integral. Different results depending upon what substitutions you use. | May 15, 2012 |

Indefinite integrals. Arriving at different results. | May 12, 2012 |

Two different results depending on integration technique | Jul 4, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**