Two-dimensional infinite potential box

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a particle in a two-dimensional infinite potential well, specifically addressing the eigenfunctions and energies of the system, as well as the effects of adding a weak potential. Participants explore the implications of boundary conditions and the separation of variables in the context of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the separation of variables in the Schrödinger equation and the resulting wavefunctions. Questions arise regarding the validity of these wavefunctions under the specified boundary conditions and the implications of the potential well's dimensions.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants questioning the appropriateness of boundary conditions and the setup of the potential well. Some guidance is offered regarding the movement of the origin and its impact on the wavefunctions and potential.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted distinction between the one-dimensional and two-dimensional cases, particularly concerning the limits of the potential well. Participants are considering how these constraints affect their calculations and interpretations.

skrat
Messages
740
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


A particle in two-dimensional infinite potential well $$
H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\left\{\begin{matrix}
0, & |x|<\frac{a}{2}\text{ and }|y|<\frac{a}{2}\\
\infty , & \text{otherwise}
\end{matrix}\right.$$
a) Find eigenfunctions and their energies. Also describe the degeneration of ground and first excited state of the system.
b) How does the first excited state "split" (is that even the right expression?) if a weak potential is added ##V(r)=\lambda sin(\frac{\pi }{a}x)sin(\frac{\pi }{a}y)##?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


First part is rather easy, I will only write the few steps:
a) Let ##\psi =X(x)Y(y)## than Schrödinger equation looks something like $$-\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m}\frac{{X}''}{X}-\frac{\hbar ^2}{2m}\frac{{Y}''}{Y}+V_x+V_y=E_x+E_y$$ We can notice that ##x## and ##y## can be completely separated, therefore our solution is $$\psi(x,y)=Asin(\frac{n_x\pi }{a}x)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)$$ any energies should be $$E=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}(k_x^2+k_y^2)=\frac{\hbar^2\pi^2}{2ma^2}(n_x^2+n_y^2)$$ There is no degeneration of the ground state, while we have two possible states in the first excited state.

b) Ammmm? Some help, please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skrat said:
A particle in two-dimensional infinite potential well $$
H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\left\{\begin{matrix}
0, & |x|<\frac{a}{2}\text{ and }|y|<\frac{a}{2}\\
\infty , & \text{otherwise}
\end{matrix}\right.$$
$$\psi(x,y)=Asin(\frac{n_x\pi }{a}x)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)$$

Hello, skrat. Did you check to see if your wavefunctions satisfy the appropriate boundary conditions?
 
TSny said:
Hello, skrat. Did you check to see if your wavefunctions satisfy the appropriate boundary conditions?
Am... Not really. But they should.
Why wouldn't they? We get a completely separated equations for ##x## and ##y## variables as if we only had a one-dimensional potential. We know that in one dimension the solution is ##\psi =Asin(\frac{n\pi}{a}x)##.
 
skrat said:
Am... Not really. But they should.
Why wouldn't they? We get a completely separated equations for ##x## and ##y## variables as if we only had a one-dimensional potential. We know that in one dimension the solution is ##\psi =Asin(\frac{n\pi}{a}x)##.

For 1D, the solution ##\psi =Asin(\frac{n\pi}{a}x)## is for a well that extends from x = 0 to x = a.
 
##\psi (0,y)=Asin(0)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)=0##

##\psi (a,y)=Asin(\frac{n_x\pi }{a}a)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)=Asin(n_x\pi)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)=0##

or am I missing something?
 
skrat said:
##\psi (0,y)=Asin(0)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)=0##

##\psi (a,y)=Asin(\frac{n_x\pi }{a}a)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)=Asin(n_x\pi)sin(\frac{n_y\pi }{a}y)=0##

or am I missing something?

Your 2D well extends from x = - a/2 to x = a/2 rather than x = 0 to x = a. Similarly for y.
 
Am, ok that's true but the well is the same. Is it that important not to move the origin to one corner?
 
skrat said:
Am, ok that's true but the well is the same. Is it that important not to move the origin to one corner?
You can move the well so that the origin is at one corner. Then your wavefunctions will be valid. But you will then have to "move" your potential V(r) in a corresponding manner when working out part (b).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K