A Two-electron Lagrangian in QED

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fefetltl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electron
Fefetltl
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
In this thread Ifqm has asked what was the Lagrangian of an electron and a proton interacting together. He proposed a Lagrangian containing electron-proton interaction and the tiny QED field correction (electromagnetic tensor part). His first Lagrangian seems intuitive as a sum of 2 Dirac Lagrangian. The second far less because of the exchange-like terms between protons and electrons.

No one was able to give a Lagrangian for this 2 particles case because the proton is composed of quarks in QFT. But that should be easy for this one because electrons are elementary. So what is the Lagrangian for 2 interacting electrons (in 3D+time space) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Specially relativistic quantum field theory works with one Lagrangian per field type, or per particle type. It also assumes the fields are elementary (the "particle" we name its occupation number one is not composed of other "particles"). So a "Lagrangian for two interacting electrons" is still the QED Lagrangian (in the low energy limit).
 
Thanks dextercioby.

So in this case, what is the Lagrangian for each electron ? The question behind it is what is the interaction term (derivative, mass and QED correction are just Dirac Lagrangian I assume)?
 
They are identical particles, so you only need a Lagrangian (which we call "free") and a mean to make them interact. With different type of Fermions, you either have the Fermi theory of weak interaction, or the full electroweak or QCD.
 
What is the mean (the Lagrangian part...) to make them interact ? They are identical, these are electrons. No the interaction is only electromagnetic as far as I know (to roughly $10^{-6}$ atomic unit it is only electromagnetic).
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top