Two main ideas how to find a career that might combine the two?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mzachman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Career Ideas
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a recent Purdue physics graduate contemplating career paths that merge a passion for teaching science and space exploration. Key suggestions include pursuing a career in education, such as becoming a high school teacher or community college instructor, rather than entering physics graduate programs, especially if research is not of interest. Participants emphasize the importance of aligning career choices with personal interests to avoid burnout, particularly in demanding fields like physics. Alternative options like lobbying for space research are also proposed, highlighting the political aspects of space exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of educational pathways in science, particularly in physics and engineering.
  • Familiarity with career options in science communication and outreach.
  • Knowledge of the political landscape surrounding space exploration funding and advocacy.
  • Awareness of the differences between research-focused and teaching-focused graduate programs.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the requirements and benefits of obtaining a Master's in Education for science teaching.
  • Explore career opportunities in science communication, including roles in museums and observatories.
  • Investigate the role of lobbying in science funding, particularly for space exploration initiatives.
  • Learn about alternative graduate programs that focus on applied physics or aerospace engineering without a research emphasis.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for recent graduates in physics, aspiring educators, and individuals interested in science communication and advocacy, particularly in the context of space exploration.

Mzachman
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,

It's been quite a while since I have posted on here, but I used to cruise around and read quite a bit and answer a question every now and again. Now I have a question that I have been trying to answer myself, and it isn't an easy one, and I just remembered this forum and all of the people that could potentially be so helpful with my situation...

Basically, to make a long story short, I am graduating from Purdue this coming semester with a Bachelor's in Physics. I am heading to graduate school now, but I'm not exactly sure what for. I have done a ton of soul searching over the last year or two trying to figure out what I want to do, and it has come down to two things that keep coming back for me:

1. I love the idea of getting people excited about physics/science, and teaching them about it (basically giving them what was given to me - the awe and excitement). When I think about this I think of people like Walter Lewin, Brian Cox, Carl Sagan, Richard Feynman, etc. etc. I would love to be someone like that, and I know that a degree/career in physics directly allows for that. Unfortunately I've come to realize I'm not necessarily interested in doing "true" physics research. Something about the way it is done these days... I'm interested in the results, but not necessarily being the one that does it (much the opposite of what I "thought" I would feel like a while ago...)

2. I also love space, and the idea of space exploration. Knowing that we live in a time so immediately following the first time humans ever left Earth, and knowing that I could take part in some of the first space exploration EVER by the human race also really exhilarates me. This would be something I would be interested in doing for "work," rather than something like real true physics research (basic type research).

So what I am wondering now, is if there is any way to combine these... What do you think? Is there any way of achieving both? As of right now I am planning on applying to Aerospace Engineering at some schools, Applied Physics at Cornell, and possibly a physics program or two other places (and maybe astrophysics/astronomy at somewhere like Penn State).

Do you have any advice or recommendations? Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't want to do research, don't apply to physics or astronomy graduate programs. Maybe look into getting a job at a museum, or an observatory, or teaching high school - something more about sharing what you know than having to come up with something original, which doesn't interest you. And if you're not interested in what you're doing, you won't be able to make yourself work 60 hours a week at it for 4-8 years, which is what a PhD will require even if you aren't attending a top school - and don't take a spot in those programs away from someone who actually does want a research job.
 
Mzachman said:
When I think about this I think of people like Walter Lewin, Brian Cox, Carl Sagan, Richard Feynman, etc. etc. I would love to be someone like that, and I know that a degree/career in physics directly allows for that.

It sounds like you should teach high school and/or community college.

If you are not interested in research, I would strongly, strongly, strongly, advise that you don't go to physics graduate school. You might consider getting a masters in education. One problem with physics graduate school is that I don't think it's possible to get a Ph.D. without getting a little (or very cynical) about physics.

Knowing that we live in a time so immediately following the first time humans ever left Earth, and knowing that I could take part in some of the first space exploration EVER by the human race also really exhilarates me. This would be something I would be interested in doing for "work," rather than something like real true physics research (basic type research).

1) Become a lobbyist
2) Become a high school teacher

If you can brainwash future voters into supporting space research, you've done a lot. The problems with getting people into space at this point are not technical but political.

Do you have any advice or recommendations? Thanks for any help!

You might consider not doing physics as a career. You can do something for love. You can to something for money. If you try to mix the two, it usually doesn't work out well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K