Two people in a boat and one person throws a ball

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soniteflash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Boat
AI Thread Summary
In the scenario of two people in a boat, when the person at the front throws a ball to the person at the back, the boat initially moves forward due to the force exerted by the throw. Upon catching the ball, the person at the back exerts an equal and opposite force, which may cause the boat to move backward. The discussion emphasizes Newton's Third Law and the conservation of momentum, noting that there are no external horizontal forces acting on the boat and its occupants. The conversation explores how these principles apply to the motion of the boat before and after the ball is thrown and caught. Ultimately, the conservation of momentum is identified as the key principle governing the system's behavior.
Soniteflash
Messages
36
Reaction score
1
1. Two people sit at opposite ends of a boat. Ther person at the front of the boat has a ball and throws it to the person sitting at the back of the boat who catches it.

What is the motion of the boat at the time immediaately after the ball is thrown and later after the ball is caught ?

Answer choices.

After Throw After the Catch
(A) Boat moves foward. Boat moves foward.
(B) Boat moves foward Boat moves backward.
(C) Boat moves foward. Boat does not move.
(D) Boat moves backwards Boat does not move.
(E) Boat moves backwards Boat moves foward.

2. Newton Third Law.

3. I honestly don't know. What i would say is that that the boat moves foward. After that I am just confused. What actually happens when the person at the back catches the ball? Doesnt he exert a force that us equal and opposite in direction?

I used my phone and the spacing is messed up. After the throw and Ablfter the Catch should be seperated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Soniteflash said:
What actually happens when the person at the back catches the ball? Doesnt he exert a force that us equal and opposite in direction?

What does Newton's Third Law say?
 
  • Like
Likes Soniteflash
How about a conservation law instead?
 
  • Like
Likes Soniteflash
haruspex said:
How about a conservation law instead?

Yes, that is probably a better way to approach the problem.
 
  • Like
Likes Soniteflash
If object one exerts a force on object two, then object 2 exerts a force on object one that is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
 
Conservation Law? What is being conserved here?
 
Soniteflash said:
Conservation Law? What is being conserved here?
What external forces act on the boat+occupants+ball system?
 
Hmm, would the only external force be the force from throwing the ball?.
 
Soniteflash said:
Hmm, would the only external force be the force from throwing the ball?.
How is that external to the system?
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
How is that external to the system?
Ok. Let me rethink. That would be an internal force then. I think that there is no external force acting on the boat+occupants+ ball system then.
 
  • #11
Soniteflash said:
Ok. Let me rethink. That would be an internal force then. I think that there is no external force acting on the boat+occupants+ ball system then.
Well, no external horizontal force, which is all we need.
So what conservation laws apply?
 
  • Like
Likes mooncrater
  • #12
Conservation law. Are you speaking of conservation of kinetic energy?
Sorry I feel kinda dumb at the moment...
 
  • #13
Soniteflash said:
Conservation law. Are you speaking of conservation of kinetic energy?
Sorry I feel kinda dumb at the moment...
Not that one. Two others to choose from...
 
  • Like
Likes Soniteflash
  • #14
haruspex said:
Not that one. Two others to choose from...
Uhm conservation of momentum maybe?
 
  • Like
Likes AlephNumbers
  • #15
Well for every action there is an opposite reaction...
 
  • #16
Soniteflash said:
Uhm conservation of momentum maybe?
Yes. Apply that to the before throw and after throw conditions.
 
  • #17
J-Fly said:
Well for every action there is an opposite reaction...
Yes, and conservation of momentum can be derived from that, but for the present problem it's more convenient to invoke the conservation law itself.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top