MHB Two Similar Limits with Different Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter Velo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limits
Velo
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
So, I'm still struggling with limits a bit.. Today, I've tried solving two different exercises which look pretty much the same. I could solve the first one relatively easily:

$$\lim_{{x}\to{+\infty}}\frac{\sqrt{4x^{2}-1}-x}{x-3}$$

I applied the usual steps and arrived to the expression:

$$\lim_{{x}\to{+\infty}}\frac{3-\frac{1}{x^2}}{\sqrt{4-\frac{1}{x^2}}+1-3\sqrt{\frac{4}{x}-\frac{1}{x^3}}-\frac{3}{x}}$$

Then, by replacing x with $$+\infty$$, the answer was 1, which was correct according to my solution sheet. The second exercise is the same as above, but $$x$$ tends to $$-\infty$$ instead of $$+\infty$$. I did the same steps I used in the first exercise, and arrived at the same answer. However, the solution for the second exercise is supposed to be -3 , not 1. I'm unsure of when the $$-\infty$$ affects the expression here since it's always in the bottom part of a fraction, and so both $$+\infty$$ and $$-\infty$$ should make the fraction tend to 0. The second exercise:

$$\lim_{{x}\to{-\infty}}\frac{\sqrt{4x^{2}-1}-x}{x-3}$$

Thanks for any help in advanced!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I have moved your thread here to our "Pre-Calculus" forum, as this is where we want threads regarding simple limits to be.

For the first limit, I would write:

$$\lim_{x\to+\infty}\frac{\sqrt{4x^{2}-1}-x}{x-3}=\lim_{x\to+\infty}\left(\frac{\sqrt{4x^{2}-1}-x}{x-3}\cdot\frac{\dfrac{1}{x}}{\dfrac{1}{x}}\right)=\lim_{x\to+\infty}\frac{\sqrt{4-\dfrac{1}{x^2}}-1}{1-\dfrac{3}{x}}=\frac{2-1}{1}=1$$

For the second limit, let's use the substitution:

$$u=-x$$

and the limit becomes:

$$-\lim_{u\to+\infty}\frac{\sqrt{4u^{2}-1}+u}{u+3}=-\lim_{u\to+\infty}\left(\frac{\sqrt{4u^{2}-1}+u}{u+3}\cdot\frac{\dfrac{1}{u}}{\dfrac{1}{u}}\right)=-\lim_{u\to+\infty}\frac{\sqrt{4-\dfrac{1}{u^2}}+1}{1+\dfrac{3}{u}}=-\frac{2+1}{1}=-3$$
 
Thanks for the quick reply! Sorry I created the post in the wrong forum btw, I wasn't sure where limits would go to :S

Also, hm.. Should we always use the substitution method to make the variable tend to $$+\infty$$ instead of $$-\infty$$? Or is there something about that particular limit that makes that the most viable option?
 
Another approach:

Start with

$$\lim_{x\to-\infty}\dfrac{\sqrt{4x^2-1}-x}{x-3}$$

Divide top and bottom by $x$:

$$\lim_{x\to-\infty}\dfrac{\dfrac{\sqrt{4x^2-1}}{x}-1}{1-\dfrac3x}$$

Now, to bring $x$ under the radical in the numerator, we square and take the square root but that is the absolute value of $x$, so we put a minus sign in front of the radical since $x$ tends to $-\infty$:

$$\lim_{x\to-\infty}\dfrac{-\dfrac{\sqrt{4x^2-1}}{\sqrt{x^2}}-1}{1-\dfrac3x}=-3$$
 
Another interesting limit problem specifically for this one is what if x approaches 3?
Negative infinity if $$x\to 3^-$$ and positive infinity if $$x\to 3^+$$. So if $$x\to 3$$ then DNE.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top