Two-Stage BJT Amplifier Homework: Solving for Input Resistance and Voltage Gain

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alkozy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Amp Bjt Homework
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on solving for the input resistance and voltage gain of a Two-Stage BJT Amplifier with a beta value of 100. Key equations utilized include Rinput = Rth, Vinput = VTH, and the voltage gain formula Gv = -Beta[(RC||RL)/Rsig + (beta + 1)re]. The user successfully calculated the Thevenin voltage (VTH) as 2.88V and the input resistance (Rinput) as 31.97K ohms. However, they encountered difficulties in completing the solution due to a missing "+" sign in their handwritten equation, which highlights the importance of thorough analysis and verification of each step.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of BJT amplifier configurations
  • Familiarity with Thevenin's theorem
  • Knowledge of small-signal parameters such as beta and alpha
  • Proficiency in circuit analysis techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Review BJT amplifier design principles and configurations
  • Study Thevenin and Norton equivalent circuits in depth
  • Learn about small-signal models and parameters in transistor circuits
  • Explore advanced circuit analysis techniques for multi-stage amplifiers
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone involved in the analysis and design of BJT amplifiers will benefit from this discussion.

Alkozy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


see pic in the attachment
beta = 100

Homework Equations


Rinput=Rth
Vinput=VTH
iB= ic/beta
IE=ic /alpha
iB=iE/(beta+1)
gm=IC/VT
Avo=-gmRC
Av=-gm(RC||RL)
Gv=-Beta[(RC||RL)/Rsig+(beta+1)re
re=alpha/gm

The Attempt at a Solution


solving each stage separately. First DC analysis. open all Capacitors.
V thevinin can be obtained by voltage divider = 2.88 v
R input = 31.97 K ohm
loop between the base and emitter
2.88-iB (31.97k)-0.7-iB(beta+1)(3.9k)=0
I have attached a pic of my attempt to solve it. please see attachment 2

i couldn't complete the solution
 

Attachments

  • 7.jpg
    7.jpg
    32.3 KB · Views: 410
  • 7s.jpg
    7s.jpg
    39.4 KB · Views: 418
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
There is an important "+" sign missing from your first handwritten equation, iB = 2.88 (31.97k ...

This is something you would have readily discovered by repeating your analysis from scratch. Often that is the most expedient course, when trying to identify ones mistake.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K