U-Shaped Coil Tokamak: Poloidal Field Control

  • Thread starter Thread starter artis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coil Tokamak
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the use of U-shaped coils for poloidal field control in tokamaks, specifically addressing their potential to enhance the magnetic field in areas where the toroidal field is weaker due to geometric constraints. Participants explore the feasibility of integrating these coils with traditional toroidal field coils, emphasizing the importance of current return paths and field geometry. The conversation highlights the necessity of understanding how coil circuits are closed to effectively manipulate magnetic field lines within the tokamak structure.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of tokamak design and operation
  • Familiarity with magnetic field theory and geometry
  • Knowledge of poloidal and toroidal magnetic fields
  • Experience with electromagnetic coil configurations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the integration of U-shaped coils in tokamak designs
  • Study the principles of magnetic field line manipulation in plasma confinement
  • Explore literature on poloidal field control techniques in fusion reactors
  • Investigate the effects of coil circuit configurations on magnetic field distribution
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, engineers, and researchers involved in fusion energy development, particularly those focused on magnetic confinement and tokamak technology.

artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
977
It is long known that the toroidal field alone is not sufficient to achieve toroidal force balance within a tokamak due to the field being bent and geometry restricting the field to be of even strength both within the inner and outer circumference of the ring. Induced current is thus used for poloidal field control as a restoring force.

Speaking about the toroidal field I was wondering , is it not possible to use U shaped coils together with the traditional toroidal field coils where the U shaped coil would be mounted on the outer side of the toroidal ring such that It's open part faces inwards , towards the center of the toroid.
This would strengthen the B field in a asynchronous way at the outer part of the toroid where the field is weaker due to geometry.
What are your thoughts about this, has it been tried is there any literature?
I can't seem to find any.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Where is the current return of that "U"? If you repeat that pattern around the torus, do you just get lines that go around the torus, i.e. the poloidal coils they already use?
 
@mfb see the attached picture, but basically think of it as a toroidal cavity similar to that of the RF cavity where you essentially have a multitude of parallel U shaped coils forming a torus but the middle is empty, Unlike a solenoid, here the field is concentrated at the outer parts instead of the inner parts or middle.

You can also think of them like individual strips of wire filling the geometrical gaps between the toroidal field solenoids/coils since due to geometry the spaces between the coils are not even in the outside vs inside spaces of the toroid chamber.

0D5Ps.jpg
 
That does nothing. The field inside such a coil is zero, assuming your current return is somewhere far outside. Think of the field geometry you want to get, then remember rot B = 0 outside of coils.
 
I think @mfb I get your point, because if the coil is fed externally then it forms a loop on the outside part instead of forming one at the side facing the toroid chamber, so it would have to be fed internally somewhat like an RF cavity is because we know that in a cavity the B field indeed is set up.
So it must be all decided by how the coil circuit is closed which determines where the field lines will be.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
21K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
965
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K