considering divergence of a sequence in the reals, a[itex]_{n}[/itex], if such a sequence → +∞ as → n, then I would like to know what type of sequence this reuqires. (excluding divergence to -∞ for now)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

so a_n → +∞ iif:

[itex]\forall[/itex] M [itex]\exists[/itex] N, [itex]\forall[/itex] n[itex]\geq[/itex]N [itex]\Rightarrow[/itex] a_n [itex]\geq[/itex] M .

So is the above equivalent to stating ( and so another way of saying a_n → +∞ ):

1. a_{n} is increasing &

2. a_{n} NOT bounded above ?

now my main question is, why can't i simply say a_n → +∞ iff a_{n} is NOT BOUNDED ABOVE (and nothing else).

surely then a_{n} by the definition of being unbounded above means a_{n}has no choice but to increase towards +∞? Right...?

and one more consideration: so then a_{n} could be something like :

http://tinypic.com/r/11udow4/5

as drawn. This sequence oscillates, diverges and heads to + ∞ as well as -∞. So can I say this sequence → ∞ or -∞ or which!?

Thanks for any help.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Unbounded Sequences w.r Divergence

Loading...

Similar Threads - Unbounded Sequences Divergence | Date |
---|---|

Multiple Integrals for Functions Unbounded at Isolated Points | Nov 18, 2011 |

Rudin 2.41, why does an unbounded infinite set have no limit points? | Nov 4, 2011 |

Example of an absolutely continuous function on [a,b] whose derivative is unbounded. | Oct 28, 2011 |

Unbounded sequence | Jan 23, 2008 |

Proving a monotonic sequence is unbounded | Sep 24, 2007 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**