Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Homework Help: Uncertainty in physical measurements

  1. Dec 28, 2005 #1
    i have some boubts about uncertainty in physical measurements. when adding two measurable values or subtracting them, we ADD UP the uncertainties-that is understood.

    BUT when multiplying two measurable values WE ADD PERCENTAGE UNCERTAINTIES. Why is that?
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 28, 2005 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Have you ever taken a statistics class?

    Take a quick read here:
    http://www.rit.edu/~uphysics/uncertainties/Uncertainties.html [Broken]
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
  4. Dec 31, 2005 #3
    Here's another uncertainties manual, also from RIT incidentally, with less theory than Vern's (which might not be what you're looking for, based on your original question) but with more emphasis on actually carrying through uncertainties with examples.

    Richmond gave this to us in in print-out form during Physics I a few years back and it's a great guide: http://spiff.rit.edu/classes/phys273/uncert/uncert.html
  5. Jan 3, 2006 #4
    I still dont understand WHY multiplication of uncertainties requires ADDITION OF PERCENTAGES UNCERTAINTIES...
  6. Jan 3, 2006 #5


    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Well, I haven't taken statistics but my intuition tells me:

    If I have two numbers that have an uncertainty of 10%, and I multiply them together, will my uncertainty be 100%? That doesn't make sense does it?

    Try it with 1 x 1. Your worst case is 0.81-1.21, not 0.0-2.0.
  7. Jan 5, 2006 #6
    what i need is a mathematical proof or a mathematical mechanism which proves the necessity to multiply uncertainties
  8. Jan 5, 2006 #7
    Well, then maybe you should read the document linked in the very first reply instead of demanding it be spoon-fed to you. It's written clear as day:
    The same document said it is often better to use standard deviations or analysis of covariance to do your error propagation.
    A 5 minute Google search would http://www.physics.fsu.edu/users/ng/courses/phy2048c/lab/appendixI/App1.htm [Broken] have helped.

    Since you're new to posting, I feel I should mention that many helpers here feel you should show an effort to help yourself at least as much as you expect to be helped. Plenty of people wish to help, but you gotta put some elbow grease into it :cool:
    Last edited by a moderator: May 2, 2017
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook