I Uncertainty Principle in QFT & Early Universe Conditions

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the uncertainty principle in quantum field theory (QFT) and the conditions of the early universe. A participant proposes that as the scale factor approaches zero, the uncertainty of spacetime becomes negligible, leading to an infinite uncertainty in momentum-energy. This argument suggests that infinite energy could emerge from nothing at the big bang, evolving into a radiation-dominated universe. However, this speculation is dismissed as incorrect and not suitable for the forum, leading to the closure of the thread. The focus remains on the implications of the uncertainty principle in understanding the early universe's energy state.
victorvmotti
Messages
152
Reaction score
5
TL;DR
Does uncertainty relevant about the origin of the super hot state, or infinite amount of energy, of the early universe?
I have a question related to the uncertainty principle in QFT and if it is related to the early universe conditions.

Do we still have four-vector momentum and position uncertainty relation in relativistic quantum theory?

I have been following the argument related to the early universe and the emergence of matter-energy from nothing.

They often refer to the notion of quantum fluctuations.

But I wonder if a simple explanation goes like this, instead:

Since in the early universe, the scale factor in the Standard Model approaches zero, we could say that the volume of spacetime, in the proper frame, is arbitrarily small and therefore the uncertainty of spacetime is close to zero. As a result, the uncertainty of momentum-energy must be arbitrarily big, close to infinity.

So, one can conclude, simply using the uncertainty principle, that close to the big bang singularity, infinite momentum-energy is available in the early universe, which evolves first into radiation dominated and then matter dominated cosmos.

Is this argument correct?

My key question is about the origin of the super hot state, or infinite amount of energy, of the early universe, and not related to the later stage, i.e. formation of matter and antimatter and leptogenesis.

Put it another way, are we talking about quantum fluctuations of the vacuum to basically mean an application of the uncertainty principle in a universe so compact that the uncertainty of spacetime is almost zero and hence the momentum-energy uncertainty is almost infinite?

Can we just use the uncertainty principle to explain something from nothing?
 
  • Skeptical
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
victorvmotti said:
Since in the early universe, the scale factor in the Standard Model approaches zero, we could say that the volume of spacetime, in the proper frame, is arbitrarily small and therefore the uncertainty of spacetime is close to zero. As a result, the uncertainty of momentum-energy must be arbitrarily big, close to infinity.

So, one can conclude, simply using the uncertainty principle, that close to the big bang singularity, infinite momentum-energy is available in the early universe, which evolves first into radiation dominated and then matter dominated cosmos.

Is this argument correct?
No. It's not even wrong. And it's personal speculation, which is off limits here.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes Rev. Cheeseman and topsquark
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
11K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K