Unconventional Origins: The Mystery of the Optic Nerve's Cranial Classification

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prashasti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Course Optic
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The optic nerve, classified as the second cranial nerve, originates from the retina and extends approximately 4 cm to the optic chiasma. It is considered a cranial nerve despite not originating from brain nuclei because it is derived from the diencephalon during embryonic development. The optic nerve is part of the central nervous system, with myelin produced by oligodendrocytes, distinguishing it from peripheral nerves. Its classification as a cranial nerve is due to its direct connection to the brain without traversing the spinal cord.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cranial nerves and their classifications
  • Knowledge of central nervous system (CNS) vs. peripheral nervous system (PNS)
  • Familiarity with embryonic development of the nervous system
  • Basic anatomy of the optic nerve and its functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the embryonic development of the optic nerve and its origins from the diencephalon
  • Study the differences between oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells in myelination
  • Explore the functional roles of cranial nerves in sensory processing
  • Investigate conditions affecting the optic nerve, such as optic neuritis and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Students of neuroscience, medical professionals, and anyone interested in the anatomical and functional aspects of cranial nerves, particularly the optic nerve.

Prashasti
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
We had a class on optic nerve today.
Our teacher said that the optic nerve "originates" from the retina, and continues up till the commencement of the optic chiasma, and is, approximately, 4 cm long.
My question is,
Why is it considered to be a cranial nerve when it does not even originate from any of the several nuclei in the brain?
I know that it is related to the Edinger-Westphal nucleus and the facial nerve, but if it is so, why isn't it said to be originating from there?

What I thought was,

Since it is a sensory nerve, it brings the sensations from the eye ball to the brain for their processing, so it muct be studied before backwards. (Just like we study "tributaries" for veins and "branches" for arteries!)
But if it is right, then that'd mean that we don't have any nuclei for any of the sensory nerves!
(This is not true, right?)
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Prashasti said:
Why is it considered to be a cranial nerve when it does not even originate from any of the several nuclei in the brain?

From Wikipedia:
The optic nerve is the second of twelve paired cranial nerves and is technically part of the central nervous system, rather than the peripheral nervous system because it is derived from an out-pouching of the diencephalon (optic stalks) during embryonic development. As a consequence, the fibers of the optic nerve are covered with myelin produced by oligodendrocytes, rather than Schwann cells of the peripheral nervous system, and are encased within the meninges. Peripheral neuropathies like Guillain-Barré syndrome do not affect the optic nerve.

In other words, developmentally the optic nerve comes from progenitor cells that are part of the central nervous system and functionally, it resembles neurons from the CNS more than neurons in the PNS.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Prashasti
Ygggdrasil said:
From Wikipedia:
In other words, developmentally the optic nerve comes from progenitor cells that are part of the central nervous system and functionally, it resembles neurons from the CNS more than neurons in the PNS.

It is worth noting that "Cranial" implies it does not connect through the spinal cord. :-)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ygggdrasil