Uncovering the Connection Between Rings and Involutions: A Homomorphism Puzzle

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechmathian
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding two rings with involutions such that their unitary groups are homomorphic while the rings themselves are not homomorphic. Participants explore examples of rings and their associated involutions, particularly focusing on the properties of unitary groups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant introduces the concept of unitary groups defined as U(R, *) = {x ∈ R | x* · x = 1} for a ring R with an involution *.
  • Another participant suggests that the goal is to find examples where U(R, *) and U(S, ^) are isomorphic while R and S are not isomorphic.
  • A participant proposes the ring of polynomials with complex coefficients, \mathbb{C}[z], with complex conjugation as an involution, questioning the structure of its unitary group.
  • There is a claim that the unitary group of \mathbb{C}[z] consists of all complex numbers with absolute value 1.
  • Another participant mentions that the unitary group could also be isomorphic to Z2 and Z4, but this does not contribute to solving the problem.
  • One participant acknowledges the example of complex numbers with conjugation and polynomials, asserting that their unitary groups are the same while the rings are not homomorphic.
  • A participant corrects a previous statement about the unitary group, clarifying that it is +1 and -1, which is isomorphic to Z2.
  • There is a question raised about the identification of U(C[z], *) with the set of complex numbers of absolute value 1, indicating a potential misunderstanding or disagreement.
  • A later reply admits to a mistake regarding the earlier claim about the unitary group.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying views on the examples of rings and their unitary groups, with some agreeing on specific examples while others challenge or refine those examples. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the identification of unitary groups and the correctness of certain claims.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the properties of involutions and the structure of unitary groups, indicating that assumptions about the examples may not be fully explored or agreed upon.

Mechmathian
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Someone, please help me solve this problem:

First if R is a ring and * is an involution, then U(R, *):= {x \in R|x* · x = 1}

(an involution * is an antihomomorphism such that a** = a for any a)

Now the problem. Find two rings (R, S) with involutions (*, ^) such that U(R, *) is homomorphic to (S, ^). and R and S are not homomorphic.

My first problem is that i do not know of any involutions except for conjugation and transposition for matrixes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm assuming you want to find an example where U(R,*) and U(S,^) are isomorphic (as groups), while R and S aren't isomorphic (as rings). Correct?

Maybe this example of a *-ring will help you: The ring of polynomials with complex coefficients [itex]\mathbb{C}[z][/itex] (viewed as functions on [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex]), with [itex]p(z)^* = \overline{p(\bar{z})}[/itex], where the bar denotes complex conjugation. What's the unitary group of ([itex]\mathbb{C}[z][/itex],*)?
 
Last edited:
Thank you for another example. The unitary group would be all the complex numbers a: |a|= 1.
I have also thought of Examples with the unitary groups isomprphis to Z\2 and Z\4, but didn't help to solve he problem...

You are correct on the remark, the first isomorphism is an isomorphism of miltiplicative groups.
 
Actually, now that I think about it: an example would be complex numbers (with conjugation = *) and polynomials. Their unitary groups are the same while they are not homomorphic as rings! I hope I'm right! Thanks again for the example!
 
By the way the unitary group is +1 and -1 (not what i have said before, because it is true iff there was only one conjugation over the argument)and it is also isomorphic to Z2.. I guess that is another example along with matrices 2*2 (with elements = 0, 1) with * = transposition.
 
Why isn't U(C[z],*) identifiable with the set of complex numbers with absolute value 1 (i.e. the unit circle)? I actually agree with what you said in post #4; that's the example I had in mind.
 
yeah, what i said later isn't true, sorry
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K