MHB Uncovering the Hidden Simplicity of Similar Triangles

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a common GRE exam question involving similar triangles, specifically the equation $\dfrac{800}{7000}=\dfrac{x}{1400}$. Participants highlight that the problem appears more complex than it is, emphasizing the simplification process that leads to the solution. By reducing the fractions step-by-step, they demonstrate that the answer is x=160. The conversation critiques those who overcomplicate the problem by relying on calculators instead of recognizing the simpler approach. Ultimately, the thread underscores the importance of understanding the underlying simplicity in similar triangle problems.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 9548
This seems to be rather common GRE Exam Question
Which appears to harder that what it is
It looks like a similar triagle solution
$\dfrac{800}{7000}=\dfrac{x}{1400}$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
This seems to be rather common GRE Exam Question
Which appears to harder that what it is
It looks like a similar triagle solution
$\dfrac{800}{7000}=\dfrac{x}{1400}$

800/7000 = x/1400

It's a little bit of smoke.

80/700 = x/1400

8/70 = x/1400

8/7 = x/140

8/1 = x/20

Look easier?

Anyone whose first move is to produce 112,000 = 700x simply isn't paying attention.
 
"Anyone whose first move is to produce 112,000 = 700x" solves problems like this by immediately plugging numbers into a calculator!
 
tkhunny said:
800/7000 = x/1400

It's a little bit of smoke.

80/700 = x/1400

8/70 = x/1400

8/7 = x/140

8/1 = x/20

Look easier?

Anyone whose first move is to produce 112,000 = 700x simply isn't paying attention.
actually the answer is
x=160
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top