Uncovering the Meaning of "Decoy" in Bidding

  • Thread starter Thread starter pixel01
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the terminology used to describe participants in a bidding scenario where some tenderers are not genuinely competing but are instead colluding to benefit one of the bidders. The conversation explores various terms that might apply to this situation, including legal and informal language, and touches on concepts of corruption and collusion.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that tenderer A could be described as a "decoy," while tenderers B and C may be seen as accomplices or shill bidders.
  • Others propose the term "cartel" to describe the arrangement, although some participants argue it may not fit the specific scenario discussed.
  • A few participants mention "collusion" and "corruption" as broader terms that encompass the actions of the tenderers involved.
  • Definitions of terms like "shill," "ringer," and "colluder" are debated, with varying opinions on their appropriateness in this context.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of such bidding practices being illegal in various jurisdictions, referencing specific laws related to bid-rigging.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the exact terminology that best describes the roles of the tenderers in this bidding scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the most appropriate term to describe the tenderers involved in the collusion. Multiple competing views remain regarding the terminology and the implications of their actions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the terms discussed may vary in legality and usage depending on the context of bidding and the specific laws in different regions. There is also ambiguity regarding the definitions and appropriateness of certain terms in relation to the scenario presented.

  • #31
BobG said:
I think this term only applies to gum chewers distributed around the class room who collude in popping their gum in a pattern that confuses the teacher as to which part of the classroom the gum popping is coming from.

When the teacher looks to the right of the room to catch the gum chewer, someone on the left side of the classroom pops their gum. When the teacher looks to the left, someone on the right pops their gum. And so on...

Or is that a confragumasticator?

Any of you folks ever play Balderdash? I used to love that game.
:smile:

I have never forgotten a friend of mine mentioning a phrase one of his teachers used "masticate to peptic euphoria".

Are we hijacking this thread?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Evo said:
Are we hijacking this thread?
Is there a GD thread that didn't get hijacked at least to some extent? If so, we aren't doing our jobs. :smile: Dammit! Someone is moving the smilies!
:mad:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K