Just to be clear, I understand the difference between sigma summation and integration. Sigma summation is, put simply, the discrete version of integration. Rather than a continuous sum of a function for given values, sigma summation provides a sum of a function for given regions that is evaluated at discrete intervals. My question is: When would sigma summation ever be used as a more effective substitute for integration? Integration can only be more accurate than sigma summation as a result of its infinitely continuous nature...right? When -- in the world of physics -- is discrete summation a more accurate means of evaluating the sum for given values of a function?(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Thanks

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Under which circumstances would sigma summation be used instead of integration?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Under circumstances sigma | Date |
---|---|

I Rate of change of area under curve f(x) = f(x) | Jan 2, 2018 |

I How to calculate the area under a curve | Jul 21, 2017 |

B Area under the curve of a Polar Graph | May 1, 2017 |

I Area under curve using Excel question | Apr 13, 2017 |

Meaning of sigma in a 2D sigma | Jul 29, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**