Undergrad, Grad, Postdoc, Tenure Stream

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the progression of students in physics and mathematics from undergraduate studies through to potential academic careers, including obtaining degrees, postdoctoral positions, and tenure-track professorships. Participants share personal experiences and observations regarding the challenges and statistics associated with these academic pathways.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reflects on their experience as a math major, noting a significant drop in the number of students continuing in the field and emphasizing the importance of persistence and dedication over mere intelligence.
  • Another participant highlights the current efforts by funding agencies, such as the NSF's VIGRE program, to increase the number of US citizens obtaining advanced degrees in mathematics, suggesting that this creates a more favorable environment for domestic students.
  • Concerns are raised about the perceived decline in the number of qualified US students in graduate math programs compared to international students, with a suggestion that this trend may influence hiring practices in academia.
  • Participants provide links to external statistics and studies that may offer additional insights into the trends in academic progression in the sciences and engineering.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects a mix of personal anecdotes and observations, with no clear consensus on the statistics regarding progression through academic stages. Participants express differing views on the current state of mathematics education and the implications for US students versus international students.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on personal experiences and anecdotal evidence, as well as the potential variability in academic environments across different institutions and time periods.

Manicwhale
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
How many people out of the original number entering as a physics or physics/math undergrad (overall, not at any specific university) will:

1. Get their B.Sc.?
2. Get their Ph.D.?
3. Become a PostDoc, or stay in the academic stream in some way?
4. Become a professor?
5. Become a tenure stream professor?

In other words, what are the chances of reaching each stage? Feel free to add more stages if you feel they are appropriate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i have no idea. when i was a freshman math major at harvard in 1960, there were 110 roughly students in my fall honors calculus class. there were about half that many in the second semester, and i heard something like a handful finished as math majors.

i myself got a D- in 2nd semester and only returned to the fold much later. It required far more than mere smarts, everyone had that,... it took desire, dedication, persistence, and good study habits [ i mean every day], and ability to accept how many really smart people are out there, and how many of them are in math, and to accept whatever ones own place among them may turn out to be. obviously not all the high school valedictorians are going to be that in college. and all the state math champs from here to there who cannot accept being in the middle of the pack at univ, drop away. those who only want to be first, instead of learn the subject, often give up for an easier path.

this was 40+ years ago, but is similar to my elder son's experience in the 1990's at stanford. many schools today try very hard to keep more majors, but there is a strong temptation for students to major in something far easier. some of them say "i can get an A with half the work in another subject". maybe so. but...then what ?

there is a reason most new profs hired in math in US today are from other countries - Russia, Romania, Iran, China, Korea, Canada, Croatia, Italy, Spain, ...
 
Last edited:
a positive aspect for interested parties nowadays is the desire of the funding agencies to increase the number of US citizens obtaoning these degrees. There is a program at NSF funded by millions of dollars called VIGRE, which provides good stipends for US stiudents who go into grad programs in math. This enables math departments who have these grants, to admit many more students than before and to pay them better and give them less teaching duties.

This enables US students, often with weaker backgrounds than their foreign counterparts, to have an advantage in these US programs. It gives them an edge in admissions and a more advantageous situation for doing their work.

In short there is a buyers market in many graduate math programs in US today as it is hard to find US citizens who are qualified to complete Phd in math. So this is a good time to be looking for this degree. as the programs are offering as much help as possible to students who might not have been considered qualified in the past. Graduate progrms are creating "remedial" graduate entry level courses to bring US math majors up to speed. This targets talented people who attended schools where the course work was below standard.

Just the opposite obtained in the late 1970's when some universities kicked out students right and left because of a perceived glut of phD's.
 
Last edited:
For a broad survey that includes other sciences and engineers (which may or may not be useful to you), see this study:

http://www.urban.org/publications/411562.html
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K