Undergraduate Physics/Astronomy/Cosmology in Boston Area

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the experiences and insights of a transfer undergraduate considering several Boston-area universities for a focus on astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology. Key points include the perceived strengths of each institution. Tufts is highlighted for its beautiful campus and strong physics and engineering departments, with positive experiences noted from a senior physics student who took summer courses there. Boston University is also recommended due to its research collaborations with MIT and Harvard. Northeastern's co-op program is mentioned as beneficial for some fields, but not as ideal for physics majors, with advice to prioritize lab experience over internships. Concerns about credit transfer issues when transferring schools are raised, emphasizing the importance of understanding how previous credits will be accepted. Overall, the consensus suggests that any of the discussed colleges could provide valuable opportunities, but careful consideration of specific program strengths and credit transfer policies is essential.
Carraway9
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
School sites seem like they don't paint the full picture of a program, so I'd love some inside advice:

I am a transfer undergraduate and was wondering about:

Boston University (accepted)
Boston College (pending)
Brandeis (" ")
Northeastern (" ")
Tufts(" ")

My interests are in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, and getting into research as soon as I can.

Has anyone worked with graduates from these schools--were they prepared?

Thanks for reading n.n
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have you been able to visit any of these schools in person?
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Have you been able to visit any of these schools in person?
All but Tufts and BC.
 
Good choice transferring to Boston (Go Sox!). My pick of the litter here is Tufts. I grew up in Medford and the campus is beautiful. I am a senior physics student at UCSD and I have taken physics courses at Tufts during summers. The department has really great professors. Their engineering department is unbelievable, and with it comes a great physics department. I also support BU because they do a lot of research with MIT and Harvard. I would completely throw away a consideration of Northeastern with your BU acceptance. Their co-op program is great, but it isn't the most beneficial for physicists. You'd rather be in a lab with a professor than interning for a year doing who knows what.
 
  • Like
Likes Carraway9
Thanks for the great advice JohnPrior3 . I was really torn about Northeastern but this really helps.
 
  • Like
Likes JohnPrior3
Carraway9 said:
Thanks for the great advice JohnPrior3 . I was really torn about Northeastern but this really helps.

Obviously don't just take my word for it. I have a friend that got a computer science degree from Northeastern and the co-op was a great chance for him to make a decent pay while building his resume. What are you planning on doing with your Bachelors in Physics? Also, being a transfer student may change the co-op requirement, but I find it unlikely you will find a transfer physics major Northeastern grad on this forum or maybe even the internet. I'd contact Northeastern (upon your acceptance.. I like being optimistic) and figure out what a physics degree from their school would entail. You are eventually going to have to consider which colleges accept previous credits and what is the most cost efficient path. When it all boils down, I truly believe any of those colleges would give you great opportunities. I had a friend who transferred to Tufts after his Sophomore year and there were quite a few issues with accepted credits. I applied to transfer and was accepted to Emory after my freshman year (I was by credits a second semester sophomore) and there was a huge issue with my total credits coming from a quarter system.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top