Understand some quantum numbers in a problem

[fluidistic]

Homework Statement

Consider the following states of the hydrogen atom corresponding to l=2 whose quantum numbers corresponding to L_z and S_z are given by m_l=2, m_s=-1/2 and m_l=1, m_s=1/2. What are the possible values for the quantum number j for the states m_j=3/2?

Homework Equations

This is where the problem lies. In my class notes, I noted that m_j=m_l+m_s but for the second cases this makes no sense.
I also have noted j=l+s, l+s-1,...,|l-s|.

The Attempt at a Solution

I tried to find some information on j in hyperphysics and wikipedia but I'm still stuck. I don't really understand what is the j. Is it just an index used in the "m_j"? And m_j is the quantum number for the total angular momentum of the atom? I don't really understand what it means.

 

[Redbelly98]

j is the index for the total angular momentum. m_j gives the z-component of j, i.e. it's the quantum number corresponding to J_z.

If you're still stuck, I would make a list of:

• Possible values of j, given that l=2
• For each j, what are the possible values of m_j?

 

[fluidistic]

j is the index for the total angular momentum. m_j gives the z-component of j, i.e. it's the quantum number corresponding to J_z.

If you're still stuck, I would make a list of:

• Possible values of j, given that l=2
• For each j, what are the possible values of m_j?

Hey redbelly, I'm a bit confused.
Thanks for your description. Isn't J_z equal to S_z+L_z?
When l=2, m_l runs from -2 to 2 and m_s runs from -1/2 to 1/2.
I think that L_z=\frac{\hbar}{2} no matter what l is worth. And S_z could be worth -\hbar /2 or \hbar /2.
Hmm I'm sure I'm wrong, I need some sleep I think. I'm getting back to it right after breakfast. Feel free to correct me meanwhile :)

 

[Redbelly98]

I am now remembering how confusing it was for me to get a handle on a lot of quantum mechanics concepts when I was first learning them.

Hey redbelly, I'm a bit confused.
Thanks for your description. Isn't J_z equal to S_z+L_z?

Yes.

When l=2, m_l runs from -2 to 2 and m_s runs from -1/2 to 1/2.

Yes.

I think that L_z=\frac{\hbar}{2} no matter what l is worth.

Well, no. Do you really mean L_z here? L_z is the value of the z-component of orbital angular momentum, and equal to m_l \hbar.

And S_z could be worth -\hbar /2 or \hbar /2.

Yes.

Hmm I'm sure I'm wrong, I need some sleep I think. I'm getting back to it right after breakfast. Feel free to correct me meanwhile :)

.​

Hey, I just realized that I did not answer an important question of yours from Post #1:

I don't really understand what is the j. Is it just an index used in the "mj"? And mj is the quantum number for the total angular momentum of the atom?

No, not really.

Since the orbital and spin angular momenta represent the same type of physical quantity -- namely, angular momentum -- they can be added together to get a total angular momentum. This total angular momentum is denoted by J, which is the vector sum of orbital and spin, L+S. The quantum number associated with J is j (not m_j as you said).

By straightforward vector addition, the magnitude of J must be from |L-S| (minimum) to |L+S| (maximum). It's quantum number j takes on values from |l-s| to |l+s|, in increments of 1.

Just like we do for the other angular momentum quantities L and S, we can talk about the z-component of J, which we call J_z. The quantum number associated with J_z is m_j, which takes on values from -j to +j in increments of 1. Note that m_j works the same way that m_l and m_s do with respect to l and s.

 

[fluidistic]

Ok thank you very much for your last post, I've learned much from it.
What I've done:
j is either 5/2 or 3/2 in both cases.
This gives me m_j could be either -5/2, -3/2, -1/2, 1/2, 3/2 and 5/2 for j=5/2 and m_j=-3/2, -1/2, 1/2, 3/2 for j=3/2.
Now I don't know how to determine the value of m_j given the values of m_l and m_s

 

[fluidistic]

Hmm looking back at the original question, I'd answer that both j=5/2 and j=3/2 can give m_j=3/2.
But I didn't use m_l nor m_s. I don't feel like I'm doing the things right.

 

[Redbelly98]

Hmm looking back at the original question, I'd answer that both j=5/2 and j=3/2 can give m_j=3/2.

Yes, I agree.

But I didn't use m_l nor m_s. I don't feel like I'm doing the things right.

You're answer is good. m_l and m_s were used in the actual problem statement, to come up with m_j (=m_l and m_s) = 3/2.

Just like the z-components of vectors are added to calculate the z-component of a vector sum, m_l and m_s add up to m_j.

 

[fluidistic]

Ok Redbelly. You've been so helpful, thank you very much!