Understanding 20 ÷ 2(1+1)= ? - Homework Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter quietrain
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The expression 20 ÷ 2(1+1) can lead to different interpretations based on order of operations. One interpretation results in 20 ÷ 2 x 2, yielding 20, while another interpretation sees it as 20 ÷ [2(1+1)], resulting in 5. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper notation, suggesting that clearer typesetting could prevent confusion. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards the first interpretation being correct, despite the ambiguity in the original expression. Clarity in mathematical notation is crucial to avoid misinterpretation.
quietrain
Messages
648
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



what is 20 ÷ 2(1+1)= ?


The Attempt at a Solution



is it 20 ÷ 2 x (2) = 10 x (2) = 20?

or 20 ÷ 2(2) = 20 ÷ 4 = 5 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ah thank you , will give it a look
 
Your first way, giving 20, is correct, although the best way to write the expression is not with that kind of Division operation symbol. I would prefer to write it this way, if you could go from text display into proper typesetting yourself:

(20/2)*(1+1)

The first Division is done first, and the result is multiplied by "one plus one". (That also means that the original shown expression in the grouping symbols, "1+1" would be done before doing the first Division).
 
symbolipoint said:
Your first way, giving 20, is correct, although the best way to write the expression is not with that kind of Division operation symbol. I would prefer to write it this way, if you could go from text display into proper typesetting yourself:

(20/2)*(1+1)

The first Division is done first, and the result is multiplied by "one plus one". (That also means that the original shown expression in the grouping symbols, "1+1" would be done before doing the first Division).

hmm but shouldn't the 2 be a like a factor of (1+1)?

so by right it should be seen as 20 ÷ [2(1+1)] = 5

thats the reason why we write it as 2(1+1) and not 2 x (1+1) right? although i admit it is a shorthand notation
 
It was beaten to death, please refer to the old thread. Math is clear here, notation pretends to be ambiguous.

Topic locked.
 

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K