Understanding a very simply RL circuit

  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rl circuit
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the analysis of a simple RL circuit, particularly the relationships between current, voltage, power, and work. The differential equation governing the circuit is presented, leading to a solution for current over time. Questions arise regarding the negative sign in the power generated by the back emf in the inductor and the interpretation of power and work associated with the voltage source. It is clarified that power can be defined with appropriate polarity, and the passive sign convention is typically used in electrical engineering to maintain consistency in calculations. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of defining polarities and understanding the physical implications of circuit equations.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
My question is about the relatively simple RL circuit shown below.
Relevant Equations
##\mathcal{E}=\oint\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}=-L\dot{I}=-\Phi'##
1712943563907.png


As far as I can tell we have

$$\mathcal{E}_L=\oint \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{l}=IR-\mathcal{E}=-L\dot{I}=-\dot{\Phi}\tag{1}$$

This differential equation can be written

$$\dot{I}+\frac{R}{L}I=\frac{\mathcal{E}}{L}\tag{2}$$

which is easily solved

$$I(t)=\frac{\mathcal{E}}{R}\left ( 1-e^{-\frac{Rt}{L}}\right )\tag{3}$$

My question is about power and work.

The power generated by the back emf in the inductor is

$$P_L=\mathcal{E}_L I=-LI\dot{I}\tag{4}$$

My first question is about the negative sign here. I don't think it should be here. Is power defined as the absolute value of emf times current? Let's assume that this is the case.

If we start with zero current, to obtain a current ##I(t)## the total work that is

$$W=\int P_Ldt=\int_0^t (LI\dot{I})dt=\frac{LI(t)^2}{2}\tag{5}$$

My second question is about the power and work associated with the voltage source.

$$P=\mathcal{E} I=(IR-\mathcal{E}_L)I$$

$$W=\int I^2 Rdt - \int\mathcal{E}_LIdt$$

$$=R\frac{\mathcal{E}^2}{R^2}\int_0^t \left (1-e^{-\frac{Rt}{L}}\right )^2 dt +\frac{LI(t)^2}{2}\tag{6}$$

Does this calculation make sense?

My final questions are about how to interpret everything.

From (3) it seems that ##\mathcal{E}## only affects the final value of the current. The speed with which such a current is achieved is affected by the self-inductance of the inductor and the resistance in the circuit.

If the self-inductance ##L## is relatively low then there is less back emf.

If ##R## is relatively high then
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The short answer about polarities is that they ALL have to be defined in schematics and such. Then given those definitions you write equations that reflect how the real world works.

Yes, you can define things so that power is negative. It's a real thing, for example, in electrical distribution networks. At my house the power flow to the city* changes polarity based on how much sun is hitting the solar panels.

Power is defined as voltage times current, in this EE context, with appropriate polarity definitions, and (maybe) "-" signs in your equations if needed to make it work like the real world.

In practice most all EEs subscribe to the "passive sign convention" so that the voltage polarity of any component in the circuit is positive where the current enters and negative where the current leaves. Then, of course, current flow is backwards from the direction electrons go (thanks Ben Franklin!). But, this convection can't always be followed, with things like transistors or networks. So everyone still has to define them explicitly. Some times this is implicit in your equations, since we know the underlying physics. With your schematic, if you write ## E = L \dot{I} ##, I know ##E## must be larger on the left side because of your current direction definition, that's how inductors work.

*note the polarity definition here, the opposite of power flow from the city.

PS: Using the passive sign convention, when the power is positive, it is flowing into the device (a "load", as opposed to a "source"). For example making heat in a resistor, increasing the energy in a magnetic or electric field, charging a battery, etc. It's a bit more complex in EM waves, but there is still a polarity (the poynting vector, for example) which is based on defining the terms used in equations to make sense IRL.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Minimum mass of a block'
Here we know that if block B is going to move up or just be at the verge of moving up ##Mg \sin \theta ## will act downwards and maximum static friction will act downwards ## \mu Mg \cos \theta ## Now what im confused by is how will we know " how quickly" block B reaches its maximum static friction value without any numbers, the suggested solution says that when block A is at its maximum extension, then block B will start to move up but with a certain set of values couldn't block A reach...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Back
Top