MHB Understanding Algebra Division Formulas: SPI, EV, PV, and AC

falcios
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If you rearrange this formula from SPI=EV/PV to EV=SPI*PV. Why is this formula like this: CPI=EV/AC is AC=EV/CPI
Aren't they basically the same.

Thanks for the help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We begin with:

$$CPI=\frac{EV}{AC}$$

Now, multiply both sides by $$\frac{AC}{CPI}$$:

$$CPI\cdot\frac{AC}{CPI}=\frac{EV}{AC}\cdot\frac{AC}{CPI}$$

$$AC\cdot\frac{CPI}{CPI}=\frac{EV}{CPI}\cdot\frac{AC}{AC}$$

$$AC\cdot1=\frac{EV}{CPI}\cdot1$$

$$AC=\frac{EV}{CPI}$$
 
I'm still lost aren't the two formulas basically the same why is there 2 different solutions?

Is there a simpler way to calculate for someone who is relearning the basics.

Thanks.
 
karush said:
also $SPI=EV/PV$ to $EV=SPI*PV$

it should be $SPI=EV/PV$ to $EV=SPI/PV$ you divide both sides by $PV$ to isolate $EV$

You want to multiply both sides by $PV$ to isolate $EV$.
 
Hello! I'm invading another thread. :o

Falcios, you are right. They are mathematically equivalent, as both Mark and Karush have shown you. However, what I think is really the issue here is: why bother with the equivalent versions?

The answer is that each version helps you calculate one quantity in terms of the others. When you write

$$\text{SPI} = \frac{\text{EV}}{\text{PV}}$$

you can find the value of SPI in terms of EV and PV. If, for some reason, you are given SPI and PV, you can find the value of EV in terms of these. Likewise, you can find the value of PV in terms of SPI and EV by doing the calculation

$$\text{PV} = \frac{\text{EV}}{\text{SPI}}.$$

In other words, there are not 2 "solutions", but two ways of interpreting results in light of what data you might have.

Hope this has helped. :D

Cheers!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top