MHB Understanding Algebra Division Formulas: SPI, EV, PV, and AC

Click For Summary
The discussion clarifies the relationship between the formulas SPI=EV/PV and CPI=EV/AC, showing that they are mathematically equivalent but serve different purposes. Rearranging these formulas allows for the calculation of one variable based on the others, depending on the available data. For instance, SPI can be used to find EV when PV is known, and vice versa. The confusion arises from the perception of having two solutions, but they are simply different interpretations of the same underlying relationships. Understanding these formulas aids in grasping the fundamentals of algebra in project management contexts.
falcios
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If you rearrange this formula from SPI=EV/PV to EV=SPI*PV. Why is this formula like this: CPI=EV/AC is AC=EV/CPI
Aren't they basically the same.

Thanks for the help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We begin with:

$$CPI=\frac{EV}{AC}$$

Now, multiply both sides by $$\frac{AC}{CPI}$$:

$$CPI\cdot\frac{AC}{CPI}=\frac{EV}{AC}\cdot\frac{AC}{CPI}$$

$$AC\cdot\frac{CPI}{CPI}=\frac{EV}{CPI}\cdot\frac{AC}{AC}$$

$$AC\cdot1=\frac{EV}{CPI}\cdot1$$

$$AC=\frac{EV}{CPI}$$
 
I'm still lost aren't the two formulas basically the same why is there 2 different solutions?

Is there a simpler way to calculate for someone who is relearning the basics.

Thanks.
 
karush said:
also $SPI=EV/PV$ to $EV=SPI*PV$

it should be $SPI=EV/PV$ to $EV=SPI/PV$ you divide both sides by $PV$ to isolate $EV$

You want to multiply both sides by $PV$ to isolate $EV$.
 
Hello! I'm invading another thread. :o

Falcios, you are right. They are mathematically equivalent, as both Mark and Karush have shown you. However, what I think is really the issue here is: why bother with the equivalent versions?

The answer is that each version helps you calculate one quantity in terms of the others. When you write

$$\text{SPI} = \frac{\text{EV}}{\text{PV}}$$

you can find the value of SPI in terms of EV and PV. If, for some reason, you are given SPI and PV, you can find the value of EV in terms of these. Likewise, you can find the value of PV in terms of SPI and EV by doing the calculation

$$\text{PV} = \frac{\text{EV}}{\text{SPI}}.$$

In other words, there are not 2 "solutions", but two ways of interpreting results in light of what data you might have.

Hope this has helped. :D

Cheers!
 
Thread 'Erroneously  finding discrepancy in transpose rule'
Obviously, there is something elementary I am missing here. To form the transpose of a matrix, one exchanges rows and columns, so the transpose of a scalar, considered as (or isomorphic to) a one-entry matrix, should stay the same, including if the scalar is a complex number. On the other hand, in the isomorphism between the complex plane and the real plane, a complex number a+bi corresponds to a matrix in the real plane; taking the transpose we get which then corresponds to a-bi...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K