Understanding and Solving Electrostatics Problems: Tips and Techniques

  • Thread starter Thread starter Murgs2012
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electrostatics
Click For Summary
To solve electrostatics problems, it's essential to determine if the electric field is static or dynamic. The equation ∇×E = -∂B/∂t indicates that in electrostatic conditions, this value is zero, confirming no magnetic field is present. If the electric field satisfies Gauss' law, ∇·E = ρ/ε, it can be categorized as electrostatic, allowing for the calculation of charge density. Conversely, if the field is time-varying, the relationship becomes more complex, requiring integration to find the magnetic field influencing the electric field. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately addressing electrostatics problems.
Murgs2012
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


exams.JPG


Any ideas on the way to approach them problems would be appreciated really.



Homework Equations



Assuming it has something to do with ∇.E=ρ/ε or ∫E.ds=Q/ε to see if the divergence of the E fields given satisfy them conditions, if not use ∇xE=-dB/dt or ∫E.dl=-d/dt∫(Bds)

The Attempt at a Solution


no idea how to approach it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are on the right way track with
\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{E} =-\frac{\partial\vec{B}}{\partial t}
For an electrostatic configuration there are no moving charges and hence no magnetic field. Knowing this, what will this equation become then?
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
So for that equation in an electrostatic field ∇xE=0, and that would be the way to determine if it's electrostatic or not?
If it's electrostatic would you then use Gauss' law ∇.E=ρ/ε to find the charge density that creates this field.

If it's not electrostatic would the non zero result found for ∇xE= -dB/dt, so integrate with respect to time to determine the magnetic field that causes the electric field?
 
How about del dot D = rho?
(D = epsilon E).
 
That's how we'd find the charge density Rho isn't it? But that's only part of the question, it was how to know if it was an electrostatic field that was annoying me
 
Murgs2012 said:
That's how we'd find the charge density Rho isn't it? But that's only part of the question, it was how to know if it was an electrostatic field that was annoying me

OK, I guess I assumed E0 was a constant. Then E is not a function of time and so must be electrostatic if it obeys the Poisson equation. Same for part c.

If E0 can be time-varying then it's more complicated.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
958
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K