1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Electrostatic potential using method of images

  1. Sep 22, 2012 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    There is a charge q, at a distance d from an infinite conducting plane (z=0).
    Determine the electrostatic potential drop between the z=0 and z=d.

    2. Relevant equations

    Ohm's Law
    DeltaV=-integral (E.dl)


    3. The attempt at a solution

    I know how to do this problem, using J = sigma E, Ohm's law, model the situation with a charge -q at z=-d, find the electric field, then integrate over the line to find an expression for the potential function V(z). I know I can integrate this potential function over the line now to find the potential drop, using the boundary condition that V=0 on the conducting plane.
    The one thing I don't understand is the units. If I have a potential in Volts, and I integrate over a line, how can it result in a potential drop? Wouldn't it be V m?

    Thanks in advance
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 22, 2012 #2

    gabbagabbahey

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Wouldn't the potential drop (or difference) just be V(d)-V(0)? Integrating the electrostatic potential V(z) from z=0 to z=d, would give you the change in electrostatic energy (sometimes confusingly referred to as electrostatic potential energy).
     
  4. Sep 23, 2012 #3
    I thought that too, but from the worked solutions I get the potential as:

    $$V(z) = \frac{I}{4\pi \sigma z} - \frac{I}{4\pi \sigma (2d - z)}$$

    Where sigma is conductivity.
    It goes on to say: "by integrating this expression between the real source and the metal boundary, we could obtain an expression for the potential drop deltaV, and dividing this by the currnt would give resistance."

    I thought it was a mistake, but this online source says the same (para three):
    http://physicspages.com/2011/10/08/curl-potential-in-electrostatics/

    Is this all just wrong?
     
  5. Sep 23, 2012 #4

    gabbagabbahey

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    Looking up worked solutions is not the same as solving a problem yourself. You'll get much more out of doing the latter.

    In any case, the beginning of the statement "by integrating this expression" is ambiguous without context that allows one to determine which expression they are talking about integrating. I suspect it is the electric field they are integrating to get the potential drop or difference.

    Here they are definately talking about integrating the electric field, not the potential. This should be clear from the equation in the middle of the paragraph.

    [tex]V(b) - V(a) = -\int_a^b \mathbf{E} \cdot d\mathbf{l}[/tex]
     
  6. Sep 23, 2012 #5
    Thanks for the help.
    I think my textbook has a mistake in it...that's why when it uses the final expression to calculate resistance it comes out in Ohm metres.

    It was worth going through the worked example with a fine toothcomb after all!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Similar Discussions: Electrostatic potential using method of images
  1. Method of images (Replies: 1)

  2. Method of image (Replies: 5)

  3. Method of Images (Replies: 7)

  4. Electrostatic Potential (Replies: 20)

  5. Method of images (Replies: 1)

Loading...