ismaili
- 150
- 0
Dear guys,
Have you ever met this kind of tensor expression?
A_{[a <b>} C_{c]} </b>
That is, indices a, b are anti-symmetric, and indices b, c are anti-symmetric as well. I am confused by this, should I think this expression as: I anti-symmetrise indices a, b first, and then antisymmetrise indices b, c? this would result in
\frac{1}{4} (A_{a b} C_{c} - A_{b a} C_c - A_{a c} C_{b} + A_{c a} C_{b})
But, if I think of this expression by the meaning that I would get a minus sign whenever I exchange a, b, as well as I exchange b,c. In this way, what I get should be
A_{[ab} C_{c]}
So, which one is correct? I'm really confused...
Thanks for your help!
Have you ever met this kind of tensor expression?
A_{[a <b>} C_{c]} </b>
That is, indices a, b are anti-symmetric, and indices b, c are anti-symmetric as well. I am confused by this, should I think this expression as: I anti-symmetrise indices a, b first, and then antisymmetrise indices b, c? this would result in
\frac{1}{4} (A_{a b} C_{c} - A_{b a} C_c - A_{a c} C_{b} + A_{c a} C_{b})
But, if I think of this expression by the meaning that I would get a minus sign whenever I exchange a, b, as well as I exchange b,c. In this way, what I get should be
A_{[ab} C_{c]}
So, which one is correct? I'm really confused...
Thanks for your help!