Understanding Dimensional Analysis: Simplifying Fluid Flow Equations

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of dimensional analysis to fluid flow equations, particularly in the context of understanding how to express variables in consistent units and the implications of order of magnitude in calculations. Participants explore the relationship between fluid flow rate, cross-sectional area, and dimensional consistency.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the necessity of having all variables in the same order of magnitude when applying dimensional analysis to fluid flow equations.
  • Another participant clarifies that the dimensional analysis does not require variables to be of the same order of magnitude, highlighting the importance of dimensionless numbers like the Reynolds number.
  • A participant shares a personal experience of struggling to connect order of magnitude with dimensional analysis, specifically in the context of fluid draining from a pipe into a bucket.
  • There is a discussion about the importance of expressing measurements in base units to ensure proper cancellation of units during calculations, which simplifies the interpretation of results.
  • One participant suggests constructing a dimensionless number from the flow rate and area to derive velocity, indicating a potential approach to the problem.
  • Another participant discusses the possibility of assuming a direct linear relationship to solve for missing components in the dimensional analysis.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for the responses but mentions difficulty in understanding their professor's expectations regarding the nature of the question posed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit varying levels of understanding regarding the relationship between dimensional analysis and order of magnitude. There is no consensus on the necessity of having variables in the same order of magnitude, and the discussion remains unresolved on some aspects of the topic.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that dimensional analysis can be straightforward but lacks coverage in textbooks, indicating a potential gap in educational resources on the topic.

Beer w/Straw
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
This is an elusive subject with added order of magnitude.

If that doesn't make sense, well... It tells that I'm confused.


Say rate of fluid flow in a uniform cross-sectional area pipe |A|=L^2,|R|=L^3*T^-1. Is it customary that I get all variebles to the same order of magnitude and be able to express it as the normal equation d^2*V for fluid flow rate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't follow your question- the variables don't have to be 'the same order of magnitude'- in fact, the dimensionless number that results (i.e. the Reynolds number) gives information about the relative importance of various processes.
 
What I said was very similar to a question I had last term, and I still don't understand how orderr of magnitude is related to dimensional analysis:

A pipe of uniform cross-sectional area drains (fluid) into into a bucket. Use dimensional analysis to determine the rate of fluid flow to a within a multiplicative constant of order 1.

Dimesional analysis, although seems simple, is in none of my textbooks

I'm stuck on |R|= L^3T^-1 with cross-sectional area |A|=L^2
 
I'm not sure if I understand the question either, but if you are talking about "why do I have to express the measurements in base units" before performing the calculation (i.e. express them as the base SI units)...well you don't *have* to, but then when you perform the calculation the units will not cancel and you will get a different number with freaky units attached to it. If you use dimensional analysis so that all length or area measurements are in meters (for example) then when you perform the calculation the "meter units" can combine together (multiplication) or cancel each other (division) and it makes the units on the final answer much more simple to interpret.
 
That's a strange question. [R] = L^3/T is easy: volume flow (liters/min, for example). Maybe the idea is to construct a dimensionless number: [R]/[A] is a velocity [L/T]. For your problem, you may also need to consider the viscosity [L^2/T].
 
From dimensional analysis alone, if you assume a direct linear relationship you can solve for the units of the missing component (x). I.e.

R = (x)A

or R/A = (x)

Since the units of R = L^3/t and A = L^2, upon cancelling the units we get for x that the units are L/t. These are the units of velocity such that:

R = vA

Is that what it was asking for?Edit: Ah, Andy you beat me too it. I think what he is asking it why does he have to make sure the dimensions of L for both the area and the volume flow rate are the same, but we won't know until he replies.
 
Last edited:
Thank you guys, I'll ponder the simplicity of your answer(s). My proffesor is a weirdo who I don't understand half the time. It took me quite some time to understand he wanted a scalar "projection" and not a vector one in one question (that was supposed to be simple.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K