Understanding Einstein's Theory of Relativity

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ppr2010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused E=mc2
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically addressing the relationship between mass, energy, and the conservation laws. Participants explore the implications of relativity on the conservation of charge and the nature of mass-energy equivalence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether Einstein's theory contradicts the Law of Conservation of Charge, citing the conversion of mass to energy and the implication of complete destruction of matter.
  • Another participant clarifies that mass and energy are not conserved separately in relativity, but rather mass-energy is conserved as a whole, while charge conservation remains a separate principle.
  • Some participants note that introductory explanations of conservation laws are often simplified, potentially leading to misunderstandings.
  • A later contribution references Wikipedia's explanation of mass-energy equivalence, suggesting that mass and energy are two forms of the same entity and that neither can be created or destroyed independently.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of relativity for conservation laws, with no consensus reached on the initial participant's concerns regarding contradictions between relativity and conservation principles.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific interpretations of mass-energy equivalence and conservation laws, which may vary among participants. There is also a potential lack of clarity regarding the definitions of mass and energy in different contexts.

ppr2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I'm not really a physics genius or professor so forgive my lack of knowledge.
I was thinking about Einstein's theory of relativity earlier,then it just popped into my head doesn't that contradict The Law of Conservation of Charge?Ex:111grams of hydrogen = 10,000,000,000,000,000 Joules.but in order to achieve that amount it will have to be completely destroyed.

I thought matter and energy cannot be destroyed.Is it just converted and what i had read was misleading and inaccurate.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass and energy are not separately conserved in relativity. What is conserved is mass-energy, which is found by adding up all the mass and all the energy (after using E=mc^2 to convert them both into the same units). Conservation of charge is a separate issue. Charge is conserved. For example, when an electron and an antielectron annihilate one other, the total initial charge is zero, and the total final charge is also zero.
 
Yes the first time you are exposed to conservation law in school it is typically simplified.
 
I thought matter and energy cannot be destroyed.Is it just converted and what i had read was misleading and inaccurate.

I wondered how Wikipedia explained mass and energy and found this:

Mass also cannot be created or destroyed, and in all of its forms, has energy. According to the theory of relativity, mass and energy as commonly understood, are two names for the same thing, and neither one is changed or transformed into the other. Rather, neither one appears without the other. Rather than mass being changed into energy, the view of relativity is that rest mass has been changed to a more mobile form of mass, but remains mass. In this process, neither the amount of mass nor the amount of energy changes. Thus, if energy changes type and leaves a system, it simply takes its mass with it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass-energy_equivalence#Conservation_of_mass_and_energy
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K