Understanding Fourier Series: Solving a Problem with Sinusoidal Functions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Fourier series to a specific problem involving the function $f(t)$ defined as $0$ on $[-\pi, 0]$ and $sin(\omega t)$ on $[0, \pi]$. Participants explore the implications of orthogonality in Fourier series, particularly regarding the calculation of coefficients and the conditions under which orthogonality holds.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant calculates the Fourier coefficients and notes that while $a_0$ and $b_1$ match the book's answers, they question why $a_n$ should also be zero despite the book including cosine terms for even $n$.
  • Another participant suggests that the orthogonality property may not apply due to the function being evaluated over half the period, prompting a direct integration approach.
  • A subsequent post questions whether orthogonality only applies for periods of $2\pi$, leading to a discussion about the symmetry of the function and the intervals used.
  • Some participants argue that orthogonality requires symmetry about the x-axis, indicating that $[-\pi, \pi]$ is valid while $[0, 2\pi]$ may not be appropriate.
  • One participant reflects on the generality of the orthogonality condition, suggesting that a full period from any starting point could also apply.
  • Another agrees, noting that phase shifts of the function do not affect the orthogonality condition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the applicability of orthogonality in this context, with no consensus reached on the conditions under which it holds or the implications for the Fourier coefficients.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the assumptions about the function's symmetry and the specific intervals used for integration, which may affect the validity of the orthogonality claims.

ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
Hi, appreciate some help with this FS problem - $f(t)= 0$ on $[-\pi, 0]$ and $f(t)=sin\omega t$ on $[0,\pi]$

I get $a_0=\frac{2}{\pi}$ and $b_1 = \frac{1}{2}$, which agree with the book; all other $b_n = 0$ because Sin(mx)Sin(nx) orthogonal for $m \ne n$

But $a_n =\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{0}^{\pi}Sin(\omega t) Cos (n \omega t) \,d\omega t $ - so this should also be 0 because the terms are orthogonal, but the book's answer has Cos terms in even powers of n?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ognik,

I could be wrong, but I don't think the orthogonality property applies here because intuitively speaking, you have an odd function that is evaluated at half the period, not the full period.

i.e Consider $\int_0^{\pi}\sin\left({x}\right)\cos\left({nx}\right) \,dx$. For $n=1$, it indeed evaluates to 0, but not for any other $n$.

I suggest that you integrate it directly, which is of the form $\int \sin\left({Ax}\right)\cos\left({Bx}\right) \,dx$.
 
Last edited:
Thanks - so does orthogonality only apply for a period of $2\pi$? Both $[0,2\pi]$ and $[-\pi, \pi]$ ?
 
Rido12 said:
I believe that it has to be symmetric about the x-axis, so any period such that $-L<x<L$. That means that $[0,2\pi]$ won't work, but $[-\pi, \pi]$ will work.

Hmm...my book uses $[0,2\pi]$ when talking about this orthogonality?
 
ognik said:
Hmm...my book uses $[0,2\pi]$ when talking about this orthogonality?

Hmm...I was talking in generality, but it does seem like it would work for $[0, 2\pi]$ in this case, my bad.
This is because $\sin Ax\cdot\cos Bx$ can be split into two individual sine terms, each of which evaluate to 0 if you integrate from $[0, \text{period}]$. (A complete sine oscillation has an equal positive and negative area which cancel)
 
For myself, thinking about it further, it seems that a full period from any start point would also work (so $[x_0, x_0+2\pi]$ - because the same length of curve(s) would be included in the interval regardless of where in the curve we start from.
 
Yep, that's also correct, as in any phase shift of the function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K