Understanding Gamma-Ray Decay Spin Rules

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pete137
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decay
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the rules governing gamma-ray decay transitions, specifically focusing on the allowed transitions for different radiation types (E1, M1, E2, M2, etc.) and the implications of photon spin in these processes. Participants explore the theoretical underpinnings of these transitions, including angular momentum and parity considerations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the omission of photon spin in the transition rules for gamma decay, suggesting that the intrinsic angular momentum of the emitted photon should be considered.
  • Another participant recalls that E2 transitions typically involve two photons, indicating a rarity compared to E1 transitions.
  • A different participant mentions that quadrupole radiation corresponds to a d-wave, which relates to an orbital angular momentum of 2.
  • Another participant asserts that the parity of atomic states does not change in an E2 transition and emphasizes the need for a solid understanding of quantum theory of radiation to grasp the mechanisms behind these transitions.
  • This participant elaborates on the mathematical formalism involved in E2 transitions, mentioning the use of symmetric dyadic terms and the Wigner-Eckhart theorem to derive angular momentum selection rules.
  • They also note that higher-order transitions become increasingly complex, requiring advanced techniques such as vector spherical harmonics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of photon spin in gamma-ray transitions, with some emphasizing its importance while others focus on the established transition rules. The discussion includes multiple competing perspectives on the nature of E2 transitions and their characteristics.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions underlying the transition rules and the specific conditions that apply to different types of radiation. The complexity of higher-order transitions and their mathematical treatment remains a point of contention.

Pete137
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi,

When i studied gamma-decay i encountered a set of transition rules telling for each radiation type (E1,M1,E2,M2,...) which transitions where allowed. For instance: a gamma ray emmited by E2 changes the parity and I_{intial}=I_{final}+2. Where you must know how to add angular momentum vectors in QM. I can apply this but don't they forget something? The gamma foton emitted carries an amount of intrinsic (spin) angular momentum of +1 or -1. Why is the foton spin not in the above formula?

I read about this topic in Krane's book: an introduction to nuclear physics chapter 10.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I remember correctly, an E2 transition needs two photons, that's why it is rare compared to E1.
 
I thought it was quadrupole radiation which is radiated in a d-wave thus corresponding to an orbital angular momentum of 2.
 
First of all you should say that parity of atomic states does not change in an E2 transition.To understand the mechanisms of all those E2,M1 etc. transition,you will have to learn a fair part of quantum theory of radiation.E2 transition is caused by a symmetric dyadic term like xp+px,which can be written in terms of a commutator [Ho,xx].You have to evaluate it between two states you want with some other condition like transversality condition(k.εα=0),which will reduce your problem to replace xx by it's traceless part.Use of Wigner-Eckhart theorem will give the corresponding angular momentum selection rule.Higher terms are contributed by the plane wave expansion which can no longer be approximated by 1 as in dipole approximation.In the same fashions,you can go for M1 transitions which is contributed by a factor like (k×εα).(x×p).However as you go to higher orders it become more difficult and you have to resort to more sophisticated formalism which employs vector spherical harmonics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K