Understanding Joint Probability with No-Replacement Rule

  • Thread starter Thread starter sauravrt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joint Probability
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the concept of joint probability in the context of events with and without replacement. When dealing with events A and B, such as the accumulation of values, the order of occurrence is generally not a concern. However, in scenarios involving no-replacement, like drawing balls from a set, the order becomes crucial. Specifically, the joint probability P(RB) can be expressed using conditional probabilities, taking into account the no-replacement rule, thereby ensuring accurate calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of joint probability and conditional probability
  • Familiarity with the no-replacement rule in probability theory
  • Basic knowledge of probability notation (e.g., P(A), P(B))
  • Concept of temporal ordering in events
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the no-replacement rule in probability theory
  • Learn about conditional probability and its applications
  • Explore examples of joint probability calculations with real-world scenarios
  • Investigate the implications of event ordering in probability problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in statistics, data science, and mathematics who are looking to deepen their understanding of joint and conditional probabilities, particularly in scenarios involving no-replacement events.

sauravrt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If A and B are two events and I want to look at their joint probability P(A.B) do I have to be concerned with the order in with A and B occur?

Saurav
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, in general. However, consider:

A = {accumulation > x}

B = {accumulation < x}.

In this case, there is a natural temporal ordering of the events A and B; B almost certainly occurs before A.
 
Thanks EnumaElish

So now if I am looking at a problem where I have 3 red balls and 4 blue balls and if I pickup two balls want to find the probability P(R|B) (i.e prob of picking Red ball given Blue ball was already picked). In this conditional probability case, the order in which the balls were picked is important, am i correct? However the joint probability P(RB) = P(R|B).P(B) = P(B|R).P(R) is not concerned with the order in which the balls were picked?

Saurav
 
You are correct that as long as you are not replacing each draw (by putting a drawn ball back into the bin), the order of draws will matter. This does not have to conflict with the definition of joint probability using conditional probabilities as long as you define each event by taking the no-replacement rule into account. So if you define P(R|B) as the probability of drawing a red having drawn a blue, then P(RB) will be defined accordingly.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K