Understanding Joint Probability with No-Replacement Rule

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter sauravrt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Joint Probability
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 3K views
sauravrt
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
If A and B are two events and I want to look at their joint probability P(A.B) do I have to be concerned with the order in with A and B occur?

Saurav
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, in general. However, consider:

A = {accumulation > x}

B = {accumulation < x}.

In this case, there is a natural temporal ordering of the events A and B; B almost certainly occurs before A.
 
Thanks EnumaElish

So now if I am looking at a problem where I have 3 red balls and 4 blue balls and if I pickup two balls want to find the probability P(R|B) (i.e prob of picking Red ball given Blue ball was already picked). In this conditional probability case, the order in which the balls were picked is important, am i correct? However the joint probability P(RB) = P(R|B).P(B) = P(B|R).P(R) is not concerned with the order in which the balls were picked?

Saurav
 
You are correct that as long as you are not replacing each draw (by putting a drawn ball back into the bin), the order of draws will matter. This does not have to conflict with the definition of joint probability using conditional probabilities as long as you define each event by taking the no-replacement rule into account. So if you define P(R|B) as the probability of drawing a red having drawn a blue, then P(RB) will be defined accordingly.