Explicit joint probability distribution.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of the joint probability distribution P(x,y,z) given the marginal and conditional probabilities P(x), P(y|x), and P(z|x). Participants explore the implications of independence between the variables Y and Z in the context of probability theory.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to compute P(z|x,y) with the given data and suggests that since Y does not depend on Z directly, P(z|x,y) might equal P(z|x).
  • Another participant asks whether Y and Z are independent of each other.
  • A subsequent post reiterates the question of independence and notes that the problem comes from a book where P(y|z) and P(z|y) are not provided, leading to the assumption of independence.
  • It is proposed that if Y and Z are independent, then P(z|x,y) simplifies to P(z|x).
  • Another participant agrees that the joint probability distribution would then be expressed as P(x,y,z) = P(x)P(y|x)P(z|x), suggesting a symmetry in the causal network of Y and Z.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the independence of Y and Z, with some assuming independence based on the lack of certain conditional probabilities. The discussion remains unresolved as to whether the assumption of independence is valid.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on assumptions regarding independence and the implications of those assumptions on the computation of joint probabilities. There is no consensus on the independence of Y and Z.

carllacan
Messages
272
Reaction score
3
Hi!

Suppose we have two variables Y and Z that depend on a third one, X. We are given P(x), P(y|x) and P(z|x). The joint probability distribution P(x,y,z), according to the chain probability rule, is given by P(x,y,z) = P(x)P(y|x)P(z|x,y)

But how can we compute P(z|x,y) with the given data?

Since Y does not depend on Z directly I "feel" that P(z|x,y) = P(z|x)(Px) but I can't find a logical reason for it.

Can you lend me a hand?

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are y and z independent of each other?
 
Stephen Tashi said:
Are y and z independent of each other?

This actually comes from an exercise in a book and neither P(y|z) nor P(z|y) are given, so I assume so.
 
Last edited:
If z and y are independent then P(z|x,y) is just P(z|x). (NOT "P(z|x)P(x)" which is P(z))
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
And the joint probability distribution would simply be P(x,y,z) = P(x)P(y|x)P(z|x), right?

It which makes sense because Y and Z are, so to speak, symmetrical in the causal network, so they should also be symmetrical in this expression.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K