Understanding Kármán Vortex Street Effect

  • Thread starter Thread starter nik2011
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vortex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Kármán vortex street effect, particularly its behavior around a smooth circular cylinder at varying Reynolds numbers (Re). It is established that for Re < 5, flow remains attached with no separation, while for 5 < Re < 40, symmetric vortices form. As Re exceeds 40, a laminar vortex street emerges. The user seeks clarity on the forces driving these regime changes and whether research exists specifically addressing the mechanisms behind vortex shedding and stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid dynamics principles
  • Familiarity with Reynolds number (Re) concepts
  • Knowledge of vortex dynamics
  • Basic grasp of laminar versus turbulent flow characteristics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical modeling of Kármán vortex street formation
  • Study the effects of Reynolds number on flow separation and vortex shedding
  • Explore experimental studies on vortex dynamics in fluid mechanics
  • Investigate the role of boundary layer theory in vortex formation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid dynamics, mechanical engineers, and researchers interested in vortex behavior and flow stability in various engineering applications.

nik2011
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I was reading about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeolian_harp" . It is explained that "the harp is driven by von Karman vortex street effect"
So I read about http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Von_Karman_vortex_street" . I also read a few other sources on von Karman vortex street effect.

It is known for the steady flow around a smooth circular cylinder that:
  • for Re < 5 no separation of the flow occurs;
  • for 5 < Re < 40 a fixed pair of symmetric vortices exists in the flow;
  • for 40 < Re < 200 laminar vortex street exists in the flow;

My question is why the flow changes its regime? I. e. why the vortices appears for Re > 5 and why the vortices begin to shed (and what force makes them to so) for Re > 40 and what force made them stay (not shed) for Re < 40? Why do they shed in that ("chess-board", "lamp-post", etc) particular order?

And has any research been done on the topic at all? (I mean exactly why the regime changes. I understand that for each separate regime a lot of research has been done)

Can anyone please explain or point me to such an explanation?

Thank you!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone, please?

Sorry, may be I posted to a wrong section of the forum. I am not actually a physicist.
I'm willing to learn to understand the explanation but I need to know if the explanation exists in the first place.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
33K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
23K