Understanding Lanthanide Series & Groupings in Periodic Tables

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the classification of the Lanthanide series within periodic tables, specifically addressing how different tables categorize Lanthanum and Lutetium. It is established that the Lanthanide series includes elements from Cerium to Lutetium, while Lanthanum and Lutetium are positioned in group 3 but are not part of the Lanthanide series itself. The conversation references various periodic table formats, including those from Los Alamos National Laboratory and WebElements, highlighting the lack of consensus on the grouping of these elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the periodic table structure
  • Familiarity with the Lanthanide series and its elements
  • Knowledge of group classifications in chemistry
  • Basic comprehension of element categorization methodologies
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between Lanthanide and Actinide series classifications
  • Explore various periodic table formats and their implications on element grouping
  • Study the properties and applications of Lanthanide elements
  • Investigate the historical context of periodic table development and element classification
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, researchers in material science, and anyone interested in the classification and properties of rare earth elements.

Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,122
Reaction score
21
I have seen many types of periodic tables which I gather into 3 categories based on how they handle the Lanthanide series (and the Actinide series is handled in an analogous way). The tables do not say the things I say below, but they imply it by the layout.

1. Lanthanum is in group 3, but not in the Lanthanide series. The Lanthanide series includes Cerium through Lutetium. The Lanthanide series is not in any group.
ex: http://periodic.lanl.gov/default.htm

2. Lutetium is in group 3, but not in the Lanthanide series, The Lanthanide series includes Lanthanum through Ytterbium. The Lanthanide series is not in any group
ex: http://www.webelements.com/webelements/scholar/

3. The Lanthanide series includes Lanthanum through Lutetium. The entire Lanthanum series is in group 3.
ex: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table_(standard)

Can we say that one of these correctly depicts theory? Or is it a case of differing, but defensible points of view?
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I came.across a headline and read some of the article, so I was curious. Scientists discover that gold is a 'reactive metal' by accidentally creating a new material in the lab https://www.earth.com/news/discovery-that-gold-is-reactive-metal-by-creating-gold-hydride-in-lab-experiment/ From SLAC - A SLAC team unexpectedly formed gold hydride in an experiment that could pave the way for studying materials under extreme conditions like those found inside certain planets and stars undergoing...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
6K
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K