Understanding Linear Combinations of Vectors

Click For Summary
A vector can be expressed as a linear combination of vectors in a span, indicating it lies within the subspace defined by those vectors. While the term "plane" is commonly used for two-dimensional cases, a more accurate term is "subspace," which can represent higher dimensions. For example, in R4, the vectors <3, 1, 1, 0>, <2, 2, 0, 4>, <5, 3, 1, 4>, and <1, 0, 1, 0> illustrate a three-dimensional subspace due to linear dependence among them. Similarly, in the vector space of cubic polynomials, the span of certain polynomials forms a two-dimensional subspace. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the geometric interpretations of linear combinations and spans.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
Hello Everyone,

Pardon me if the following is incoherent. From what I understood of what my professor said, he was basically saying that when a vector can be written as a linear combination of some vectors in a span, this means, geometrically, that the vector is in the plane that the span of vectors defines. How true is this? And if it is so, does anyone know of a good example that illustrates this point?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To clarify, a vector written as a linear combination of two vectors is in the plane defined by the two vectors. If the span has more than two vectors, it could define a higher dimensional object.
 
I'm not sure that "plane" is the right word since that tends to imply two dimensions. A more general term would be "hyper-plane" but even that tends to imply that we are working in Rn. The most correct word is "subspace".

Consider the vectors <3, 1, 1, 0>, <2, 2, 0, 4>, <5, 3, 1, 4>, and <1, 0, 1, 0> in R4.
By definition of 'span' any vector in the span of those four vectors can be written as a linear combination, a<3, 1, 1, 0>+ b<2, 2, 0, 4>+ c<5, 3, 1, 4>+ d<1, 0, 1, 0>.

But those four vectors are NOT "independent". In particular, <5, 3, 1, 4>= <3, 1, 1, 0>+ <2, 2, 0, 4> so that is the same as (a+ c)<3, 1, 1, 0>+ (b+ c)<2, 2, 0, 4>+ d<1, 0, 1, 0>. That is a 3 dimensional hyper-plane (subspace) of R4.

For another example, let f(x)= x^3+x^2+ 2x, g=x^2+ 3x- 4, and h(x)= x^3+ 2x^2+ 5x- 4 in the vector space of cubic polynomials in x (which is four dimensional). Any vector in their span can be written as a(x^3+x^2+ 2x)+ b(x^2+ 3x- 4)+ c(x^3+ 2x^2+ 5x- 4). But x^2+ 2x^2+ 5x- 4= (x^3+ x^2+ 2x)+ (x^2+ 3x- 4) so that is (a+c)(x^3+x^2+2x)+(b+c)(x^2+ + 3x- 4). That is a two dimensional subspace but I wouldn't call it either a "plane" or a "hyper-plane".
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K