The discussion revolves around the concept of "mainstream physics," exploring its definition and relationship to the broader field of physics. Participants seek to clarify what constitutes mainstream physics and how it is perceived within the scientific community.
Participants generally agree on the definition of mainstream physics as the accepted body of knowledge within the field, though there is some exploration of its nuances and implications.
Some assumptions about what constitutes "reputable" sources and the criteria for acceptance in mainstream physics remain unaddressed.
This discussion may be useful for individuals seeking to understand the distinctions within the field of physics, particularly those new to the subject or exploring its academic landscape.
Yes. Generally when someone says "physics" they mean "mainstream physics". The extra qualifier is usually omitted except when we need to make a distinction between mainstream and non-mainstream (which is, loosely, stuff that has not proven its value and usefulness).Gjmdp said:So much thanks. So it's the same like Physics?